Literature DB >> 8096573

Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

M A Hull1, J Rawlings, F E Murray, J Field, A S McIntyre, Y R Mahida, C J Hawkey, S P Allison.   

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the preferred method for administration of long-term enteral tube feeding. However, most published studies describe only short-term follow-up in any detail. We report the long-term outcome and complication rate after PEG insertion in 49 patients (mean [SE] age 64 [2] years) whose mean length of PEG feeding was 175 days (range 30-560). Data were collected prospectively. PEG insertion was technically successful in all cases, with a procedure-related mortality of 2%. Early (< 30 days) mortality and morbidity were 8% and 22%, respectively. Of 45 patients surviving for more than 30 days, 76% were able to return home and 6 patients were eventually able to revert to oral feeding. There were 27 late complications: 2 site infections, 17 mechanical problems, and 8 episodes of gastrointestinal dysfunction. 51% of patients had no problems at all and 22% had 2 or more complications. 47% of complications required a hospital visit for resolution. Long-term enteral feeding by PEG was safe, effective, and had a low complication rate. Our patients were managed by a specialist nutrition team, a policy that may reduce the complication rate and hospital visits for patients being fed at home, and allow early discharge of dysphagic patients, thereby reducing costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8096573     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)93072-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy according to Janeway.

Authors:  K Peitgen; M K Walz; M V Walz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Enteral feeding. Nasogastric, nasojejunal, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, or jejunostomy: its indications and limitations.

Authors:  C B Pearce; H D Duncan
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients.

Authors:  M Stroud; H Duncan; J Nightingale
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Dysphagia in stroke patients.

Authors:  S Singh; S Hamdy
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions.

Authors:  Irina Blumenstein; Yogesh M Shastri; Jürgen Stein
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Typing and subtyping of 83 clinical isolates purified from surgically implanted silicone feeding tubes by random amplified polymorphic DNA amplification.

Authors:  Melanie P Dautle; Ricky L Ulrich; Thomas A Hughes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Day-case percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a viable proposition?

Authors:  A Mandal; A Steel; A R Davidson; C Ashby
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Acute pancreatitis and cholangitis: a complication caused by a migrated gastrostomy tube.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamura; Toshihiro Konagaya; Takashi Hashimoto; Kunio Kasugai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children.

Authors:  V S Jones; E R La Hei; A Shun
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.