Literature DB >> 8095812

Quality control in fatally injured patients: the value of the necropsy.

W B Barendregt1, H H de Boer, K Kubat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the contribution of necropsy results to the audit care of severely injured patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University Hospital in The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 56 patients who died of severe trauma or its complications during the 10 year period, 1977 to 1987. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between clinical and necropsy findings.
RESULTS: The clinical and necropsy findings corresponded in 31 patients (55%). The necropsy brought to light errors in diagnosis or treatment that might have affected survival in eight cases (14%). The most common missed diagnoses were bronchopneumonia and severe haemorrhage, and the most common cause of death was sepsis. Age, length of stay in hospital, and time between admission and operation were not correlated with accuracy of diagnosis or adequacy of treatment.
CONCLUSION: Necropsies in patients who die after severe injuries make a useful contribution to the audit of the care of patients admitted with such injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8095812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg        ISSN: 1102-4151


  6 in total

1.  Surveillance of injury-related deaths: medicolegal autopsy rates and trends in Finland.

Authors:  Philippe Lunetta; Anne Lounamaa; Sanna Sihvonen
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 2.  Diagnostic errors in polytrauma: a structured review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Luana Stanescu; Lee B Talner; Frederick A Mann
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-01-17

3.  Studies of avoidable factors influencing death: a call for explicit criteria.

Authors:  R Westerling
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

4.  Applying modern error theory to the problem of missed injuries in trauma.

Authors:  D L Clarke; J Gouveia; S R Thomson; D J J Muckart
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Do we still need autopsy in times of modern multislice computed tomography?-Missed diagnoses in the emergency room.

Authors:  S A Euler; T Kastenberger; R Attal; M Rieger; M Blauth; M Petri
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Premortem clinical diagnoses and postmortem autopsy findings: discrepancies in critically ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephen M Pastores; Alina Dulu; Louis Voigt; Nina Raoof; Margarita Alicea; Neil A Halpern
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.