Literature DB >> 8095622

Vaccination with SPf66, a chemically synthesised vaccine, against Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Colombia.

M V Valero1, L R Amador, C Galindo, J Figueroa, M S Bello, L A Murillo, A L Mora, G Patarroyo, C L Rocha, M Rojas.   

Abstract

Preclinical and clinical studies have established the safety and immunogenicity of the chemically synthesised SPf66 malaria vaccine. The present study is a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy trial completed in La Tola, Colombia. 1548 volunteers over one year of age received three doses of either the vaccine (n = 738) or placebo (n = 810). Active and passive case detection methods were used to document clinical episodes of malaria among the study population. The follow-up period began one month after the third dose and lasted for one year. 168 and 297 episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria were documented in the SPf66 group and the placebo group, respectively; this corresponds to a crude protective efficacy of 38.8%. Incidence rates for first or only P falciparum malarial episodes were 22.3% per annum among the vaccinee group and 33.5% among the placebo group (RR = 1.5; 95% Cl 1.23, 1.84). Therefore, the protective efficacy of SPf66 against first or only episodes was 33.6% (95% Cl 18.8, 45.7), being highest in children aged 1-4 years (77%) and adults older than 45 years (67%). The estimated protective efficacy against second episodes was 50.5% (95% Cl 12.9-71.9). Our study shows that the chemically synthesised SPf66 malaria vaccine is safe, immunogenic, and protective against P falciparum malaria in semi-immune populations subject to natural challenge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Americas; Colombia; Delivery Of Health Care; Developing Countries; Diseases; Double-blind Studies; Examinations And Diagnoses; Health; Health Services; Immunization; Incidence; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Latin America; Measurement; Primary Health Care; Research Methodology; Signs And Symptoms; South America; Studies; Vaccination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8095622     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90483-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  25 in total

Review 1.  Vaccine trials.

Authors:  C P Farrington; E Miller
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Vaccines for malaria: how close are we?

Authors:  Mahamadou A Thera; Christopher V Plowe
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.739

Review 3.  Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66).

Authors:  P Graves; H Gelband
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

4.  Induction of measles virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell responses after intranasal immunization with synthetic peptides.

Authors:  C D Partidos; P Vohra; M W Steward
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Randomization and baseline transmission in vaccine field trials.

Authors:  C J Struchiner; M E Halloran
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Antibody and clinical responses in volunteers to immunization with malaria peptide-diptheria toxoid conjugates.

Authors:  R Ramasamy; D A Wijesundere; K Nagendran; M S Ramasamy
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  Recent advances in tropical medicine.

Authors:  D N Lockwood; G Pasvol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

Review 8.  Murine infection models for vaccine development: the malaria example.

Authors:  Kai Matuschewski
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Malaria vaccines.

Authors:  R Amador; M E Patarroyo
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.317

10.  Screening for a raised rectal temperature in Africa.

Authors:  R J Jones; T J O'Dempsey; B M Greenwood
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.