Literature DB >> 8093158

Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.

A M Kelly1, D Richards, L Kerr, J Grant, P O'Donovan, K Basire, R Graham.   

Abstract

AIM: To validate the Ottawa clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.
METHOD: A prospective, multicentre trial of 350 adult patients presenting with acute ankle injuries consisting of correlation of the features of the Ottawa clinical decision rule with the results of x-rays.
RESULTS: There were 75 fractures in 350 patients, five of which would have been missed by the clinical decision rule. The sensitivity of the rule was 93% with a specificity of 11%. The positive predictive value was 22%, the false negative rate 14%. Fractures that would have been missed by the clinical decision rule included one unstable fracture of the ankle, one fracture of the talus, one calcaneal fracture and one fracture each of the cuboid and navicular.
CONCLUSION: The Ottawa clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries is unacceptable for application in emergency departments in New Zealand due to a high false negative rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8093158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  12 in total

1.  Prospective survey to verify the Ottawa ankle rules.

Authors:  S Perry; N Raby; P T Grant
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-07

2.  [The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].

Authors:  P Garcés; S Gurucharri; C Ibiricu; M Izuel; J Mozo; P Buil; J Díez
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Risk of tuberculosis is higher with anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy than with soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor therapy: The three-year prospective French Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies registry.

Authors:  F Tubach; D Salmon; P Ravaud; Y Allanore; P Goupille; M Bréban; B Pallot-Prades; S Pouplin; A Sacchi; R M Chichemanian; S Bretagne; D Emilie; M Lemann; O Lortholary; O Lorthololary; X Mariette
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07

4.  Ottawa ankle decision rules.

Authors:  L Milne
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-01

5.  Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.

Authors:  C Libetta; D Burke; P Brennan; J Yassa
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09

6.  Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.

Authors:  E Papacostas; N Malliaropoulos; A Papadopoulos; C Liouliakis
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 7.  Persistent ankle pain following a sprain: a review of imaging.

Authors:  Ramy Mansour; Zaid Jibri; Sridhar Kamath; Kausik Mukherjee; Simon Ostlere
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-03-05

8.  Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.

Authors:  Afina S Glas; Bas A C M Pijnenburg; Jeroen G Lijmer; Kjell Bogaard; Roos Marnix A J de; Johannes N Keeman; Rudolf M J M Butzelaar; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.

Authors:  Lucas M Bachmann; Esther Kolb; Michael T Koller; Johann Steurer; Gerben ter Riet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-22

10.  Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.

Authors:  K L McBride
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.