Literature DB >> 8092839

Treatment of complicated urinary tract infections with lomefloxacin compared with that with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

L E Nicolle1, T J Louie, J Dubois, A Martel, G K Harding, C P Sinave.   

Abstract

The efficacy of lomefloxacin given at 400 mg once daily for 14 days compared with that of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at 160 and 800 mg, respectively, given twice daily for 14 days in the treatment of symptomatic complicated urinary tract infections was studied in a prospective, randomized, single-blind multicenter study. A total of 133 subjects presenting with signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection and an underlying abnormality consistent with complicated urinary tract infection were enrolled in the study. Bacteriologic cure was significantly better in 68 subjects randomized to lomefloxacin than in 65 subjects randomized to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole at short-term follow-up (88 versus 52%; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 77 and 94% and 39 and 65%, respectively) this difference was no longer significant at long-term follow-up (64 versus 47%; CIs, 52 and 75% and 32 and 57%, respectively). Clinical outcomes were similar for both therapeutic regimens at short- and long-term follow-ups. The organisms that infected the subjects pretherapy were more frequently resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and drug therapy was discontinued more frequently in subjects treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole because of adverse antimicrobial effects. In secondary analyses, outcomes did not differ with age or underlying genitourinary abnormality.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8092839      PMCID: PMC188212          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.38.6.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in the treatment of complicated or recurrent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  C E Cox
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-04-06       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of urinary tract infection. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  R H Rubin; E D Shapiro; V T Andriole; R J Davis; W E Stamm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of orally administered lomefloxacin.

Authors:  J W Stone; J M Andrews; J P Ashby; D Griggs; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Use of quinolones in urinary tract infections and prostatitis.

Authors:  K G Naber
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Bacterial resistance to quinolones: mechanisms and clinical importance.

Authors:  J S Wolfson; D C Hooper
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

6.  In vitro activity of lomefloxacin, a new quinolone antimicrobial agent, in comparison with those of other agents.

Authors:  R Wise; J M Andrews; J P Ashby; R S Matthews
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Suppression and treatment of urinary tract infection in patients with an intermittently catheterized neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  J L Mohler; D L Cowen; R C Flanigan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Quinolone pharmacokinetics in the elderly.

Authors:  J J Schentag; T F Goss
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-04-06       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Efficacy and tolerability of norfloxacin vs. ciprofloxacin in complicated urinary tract infection.

Authors:  A J Schaeffer; R U Anderson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.649

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance among urinary coliform isolates.

Authors:  S W Wright; K D Wrenn; M L Haynes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic characteristics of antimicrobials and optimal treatment of urosepsis.

Authors:  Florian M E Wagenlehner; Wolfgang Weidner; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  A practical guide to the management of complicated urinary tract infection.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  A practical guide to antimicrobial management of complicated urinary tract infection.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Complicated urinary tract infection in adults.

Authors:  L E Nicolle
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 6.  Role of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of serious bacterial urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Culley Carson; Kurt G Naber
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Ertapenem versus ceftriaxone followed by appropriate oral therapy for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections in adults: results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study.

Authors:  Kevin M Tomera; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Oscar G Pamo Reyna; Qi Jiang; Wendy M Wimmer; Gail L Woods; Richard M Gesser
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative effectiveness of different oral antibiotics regimens for treatment of urinary tract infection in outpatients: an analysis of national representative claims database.

Authors:  Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee; Shih-Hao Lee; Shy-Shin Chang; Si-Huei Lee; Matthew Lee; Cheng-Chung Fang; Shyr-Chyr Chen; Chien-Chang Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with piperacillin/tazobactam as empiric therapy based on the in-vitro surveillance of bacterial isolates in the United States for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Teresa L Kauf; Vimalanand S Prabhu; Goran Medic; Rebekah H Borse; Benjamin Miller; Jennifer Gaultney; Shuvayu S Sen; Anirban Basu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.090

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.