Literature DB >> 8091798

Ten years of experience with various penile prosthesis in Korean.

H K Choi1, I R Cho, Z C Xin.   

Abstract

Currently there are more than 10 types of penile prosthesis available, ranging from the very simple to the very sophisticated. We review our experiences with various penile prosthesis, with particular regard to the complication rate. From Dec. 1983 to Jul. 1993, we implanted 295 penile prosthesis of eight different types. The average age of patients was 44 years. Every patient was evaluated with various multidisplinary diagnostic approaches. The etiologies of impotence were vasculogenic 29%, diabetogenic 22%, spinal cord injury 16%, pelvic bone injury 11%, etc. The types of implanted prosthesis were AMS malleable 143, Jonas 42, Dynaflex 36, Hydroflex 8, Uni-Flate 1000 2, AMS 700 CXM 58, Ultrex 3, Mentor alpha-1 3 and the mean follow-up period was 34 months. The diameters of implanted prosthesis were from 9.5 mm to 13 mm, mostly 9.5 mm (52.9%). The length of implanted prosthesis were from 10 cm to 20 cm, mostly 16 approximately 18 cm (68.8%). Cases with uneven diameters or lengths were 20 (6.8%). The int aoperative complications were 1 corporeal rupture and 1 bladder rupture, and the postoperative complications were 2 prosthesis infections, 2 mechanical failures, and 1 prosthesis infection with mechanical failure. In those 4 patients reimplantations were successful. More than 99% (290/291) patients still have functioning prosthesis. Every prosthesis has their advantages and disadvantages. Factors to be analysed in the selection of proper prosthesis should include patients economic status, education, personality, social activity, hand dexterity, and penile size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8091798     DOI: 10.3349/ymj.1994.35.2.209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  2 in total

1.  Infection rate of penile prosthesis implants in men with spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis of available evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Tienforti; Maria Totaro; Luca Spagnolo; Francesca Di Giulio; Chiara Castellini; Giorgio Felzani; Marco Giorgio Baroni; Sandro Francavilla; Arcangelo Barbonetti
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role.

Authors:  Lucas Mira Gon; Caio César Citatini de Campos; Brunno Raphael Iamashita Voris; Luís Augusto Passeri; Adriano Fregonesi; Cássio Luís Zanettini Riccetto
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.