Literature DB >> 8090894

Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms.

C M Anderson1, R E Lee, D L Levin, S de la Torre Alonso, D Saloner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether interpretation of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis from source partitions is more accurate than interpretation from maximum-intensity projections (MIPs) from three-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The percentage of diameter ICA stenosis was measured on source images and MIPs from sagittal (n = 150) and transverse (n = 140) 3D TOF MR angiography. Measurements were compared with those from conventional angiography.
RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing 70%-99% stenosis were 96% and 78%, respectively, for sagittal MIPs, 88% and 90% for sagittal source images, 92% and 86% for transverse MIPs, and 92% and 95% for transverse source images. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves statistically significantly increased (P < .05) with interpretation from source images. Complete loss of intravascular signal was not encountered on source partitions except within a greater than 85% stenosis.
CONCLUSION: Interpretation of source partitions rather than MIPs reduces the tendency for overestimation of stenosis with MR angiography and improves the specificity for discriminating 70%-99% stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090894     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; P Humphrey; G Young; D Collie; C P Warlow
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Utility of noninvasive studies in the evaluation of patients with carotid artery disease.

Authors:  Dean C C Johnston; Larry B Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  MR angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: adequate to evaluate vasospasm-induced vascular narrowing?

Authors:  Elke Hattingen; Stella Blasel; Richard Dumesnil; Hartmut Vatter; Friedhelm E Zanella; Stefan Weidauer
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  [The significance of MR angiography for the diagnosis of carotid stenoses].

Authors:  H J Michaely; K A Herrmann; H Kramer; G Laub; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Carotid stenosis degree in CT angiography: assessment based on luminal area versus luminal diameter measurements.

Authors:  Zishu Zhang; Marja Berg; Aki Ikonen; Mervi Könönen; Reetta Kälviäinen; Hannu Manninen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.

Authors:  W M Adams; R D Laitt; A Jackson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  F Runck; R P Steiner; W A Bautz; M M Lell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  S G Patel; D A Collie; J M Wardlaw; S C Lewis; A R Wright; R J Gibson; R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.