Literature DB >> 8090878

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry.

R J Lamers1, G R Thelissen, A G Kessels, E F Wouters, J M van Engelshoven.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the computed tomographic (CT) lung densitometry results in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in control subjects (healthy persons).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spirometrically gated CT sections at 5 cm above and 5 cm below the carina at 90% and 10% vital capacity (VC) were imaged in patients and controls. Various densitometric parameters were derived from the CT data, and results were compared between the two levels of inspiration.
RESULTS: Densitometric results in patients with emphysema were substantially different from those in patients with chronic bronchitis and in controls at 90% and 10% VC. Differences in patients with chronic bronchitis and in controls were not significant at 90% VC but were significant at 10% VC (P < .001). The mean changes in densitometric parameters between 90% and 10% VC were substantially greater in controls than in patients with COPD.
CONCLUSION: It may be possible to classify lung disease with only two CT sections obtained at the same anatomic level, one at 90% and one at 10% VC, irrespective of the densitometric parameter used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090878     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.1.8090878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging of emphysema].

Authors:  C Grosse; A Bankier
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 4: imaging the lungs in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  N L Müller; H Coxson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  Comparison of low attenuation areas on computed tomographic scans between inner and outer segments of the lung in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence and contribution to lung function.

Authors:  Y Nakano; H Sakai; S Muro; T Hirai; Y Oku; K Nishimura; M Mishima
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Recent Advances in Computed Tomography Imaging in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Sandeep Bodduluri; Joseph M Reinhardt; Eric A Hoffman; John D Newell; Surya P Bhatt
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-03

5.  Systems for lung volume standardization during static and dynamic MDCT-based quantitative assessment of pulmonary structure and function.

Authors:  Matthew K Fuld; Randall W Grout; Junfeng Guo; John H Morgan; Eric A Hoffman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  CT of pulmonary emphysema--current status, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Diana Litmanovich; Phillip M Boiselle; Alexander A Bankier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Can high resolution computed tomography predict lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  K Spiropoulos; G Trakada; D Kalamboka; C Kalogeropoulou; T Petsas; G Efremidis; M Tsiamita; A Trakada; I Dimopoulos
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Morphological measurements in computed tomography correlate with airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xueqian Xie; Pim A de Jong; Matthijs Oudkerk; Ying Wang; Nick H T Ten Hacken; Jingtao Miao; Guixiang Zhang; Geertruida H de Bock; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Role of computed tomography in quantitative assessment of emphysema.

Authors:  Agnieszka Choromańska; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2012-01

10.  Variation in quantitative CT air trapping in heavy smokers on repeat CT examinations.

Authors:  Onno M Mets; Ivana Isgum; Christian P Mol; Hester A Gietema; Pieter Zanen; Mathias Prokop; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.