Literature DB >> 8090843

The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis.

C Emery1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Although the success of conservative management of congenital muscular torticollis has been well documented, relatively little is known about the determinants of response to treatment, such as treatment duration. The purpose of this study was to determine how factors such as severity of restriction of range of motion, age at initiation of treatment, and presence of a palpable intramuscular fibrotic sternocleidomastoid muscle mass affect treatment duration.
SUBJECTS: One hundred one children (mean age = 4 months, SD = 2.87, range = 0.5-15.5) who were diagnosed with congenital muscular torticollis and referred to physical therapy at British Columbia's Children's Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada) prior to 2 years of age were included in the study.
METHODS: Following a standardized initial assessment, parents were taught the home treatment program, which included passive stretches of the affected sternocleidomastoid muscle and strengthening exercises for the contralateral side, and positioning and handling skills. Evaluation at 2-week intervals included measurement of passive neck rotation and lateral flexion using an adapted standard goniometer. Treatment duration was defined as the time between initiation of treatment and achievement of full passive neck range of motion.
RESULTS: Complete recovery (full passive range of motion) was achieved in all but one of the children in this sample. The mean treatment duration was 4.7 months (SD = 5.06, range = 1-36). Correlations were noted between severity of restriction and treatment duration (r = .31) as well as between presence of a mass and treatment duration (r = .26). Multiple regression analysis revealed that severity of restriction was the strongest predictor of treatment duration. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The results of this study will make it possible for therapists to better predict treatment duration at the time of the initial assessment. By providing parents with more precise information about the length of treatment, parents may be more willing to adhere to the exercise program. [Emery C. The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090843     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/74.10.921

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  12 in total

1.  Congenital muscular torticollis-case report and an effective treatment plan.

Authors:  Muralee Mohan; Smitha Bhat; Rajendra Prasad; S M Sharma; Tarun Lunawat Jain
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-01-24

Review 2.  Congenital Muscular Torticollis: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Barbara Sargent; Sandra L Kaplan; Colleen Coulter; Cynthia Baker
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Outcomes of asymmetry in infants with congenital muscular torticollis.

Authors:  KyeongSoo Lee; EunJung Chung; SeongEun Koh; Byoung-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Factors that affect the rehabilitation duration in patients with congenital muscular torticollis.

Authors:  Ah Young Jung; Eun Young Kang; Sung Hoon Lee; Doo Hyeon Nam; Ji Hwan Cheon; Hyo Jung Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-02-28

5.  A comparison of outcomes of asymmetry in infants with congenital muscular torticollis according to age upon starting treatment.

Authors:  KyeongSoo Lee; EunJung Chung; Byoung-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-03-22

6.  A study on asymmetry in infants with congenital muscular torticollis according to head rotation.

Authors:  KyeongSoo Lee; EunJung Chung; Byoung-Hee Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-01-30

7.  Congenital muscular torticollis: Use of gaze angle and translational deformity in assessment of facial asymmetry.

Authors:  Atul Bhaskar; U Harish; Hardik Desai
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Unique finding in congenital muscular torticollis: Clinic screening on the neck of one day old neonate and ultrasonographic imaging from birth through 3 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Zhu Xiong; Shuaidan Zeng; Huanxiong Chen; Xin Qiu; Gen Tang; Yu Tang; Shengping Tang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Congenital muscular torticollis: the reliability of visual estimation in the assessment of cervical spine active rotation and head tilt by physiotherapists and the impact of clinical experience.

Authors:  Anthea Seager; Dara Meldrum; Ronan Conroy; Helen P French
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Screening for hip dysplasia in congenital muscular torticollis: is physical exam enough?

Authors:  Elizabeth R A Joiner; Lindsay M Andras; David L Skaggs
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.