Literature DB >> 8090162

A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI)

C W Hamm1, J Reimers, T Ischinger, H J Rupprecht, J Berger, W Bleifeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment for patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary artery disease is coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is widely used as an alternative approach to revascularization, but a systematic comparison of the two procedures is needed. We compared the outcomes in patients one year after complete revascularization with CABG or PTCA.
METHODS: A total of 8981 patients with multivessel coronary disease were screened at eight clinical sites, and 359 patients were randomly assigned to undergo CABG (177 patients) or PTCA (182 patients). Enrollment required that complete revascularization of at least two major vessels supplying different myocardial regions be deemed clinically necessary and technically feasible.
RESULTS: Among the patients in the CABG group, an average of 2.2 +/- 0.6 vessels were grafted, and among those in the PTCA group, 1.9 +/- 0.5 vessels were dilated. After CABG, hospitalization was longer (median, 19, as compared with 5 days for PTCA), and Q-wave myocardial infarction in relation to the procedure was more frequent (8.1 percent, as compared with 2.3 percent after PTCA; P = 0.022), whereas in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (2.5 percent in the CABG group and 1.1 percent in the PTCA group). At discharge 93 percent of the patients in the CABG group were free of angina, as compared with 82 percent of those in the PTCA group (P = 0.005). During the first year of follow-up, further interventions were necessary in 44 percent of the patients in the PTCA group (repeated PTCA in 23 percent, CABG in 18 percent, and both in 3 percent) but in only 6 percent of the patients in the CABG group (repeated CABG in 1 percent and PTCA in 5 percent; P < 0.001). Seventy-four percent of the patients in the CABG group and 71 percent of those in the PTCA group were free of angina one year after treatment. Exercise capacity improved similarly in both groups. However, 22 percent of the CABG group, as compared with only 12 percent of the PTCA group, did not require antianginal medication (P = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with multivessel coronary disease, PTCA and CABG as initial treatments resulted in equivalent improvement in angina after one year. However, in order to achieve similar clinical outcomes, the patients treated with PTCA were more likely to require further interventions and antianginal drugs, whereas the patients treated with CABG were more likely to sustain an acute myocardial infarction at the time of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090162     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199410203311601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  47 in total

Review 1.  Differences in outcome between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  J S Alpert
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Succesful Identification and Management of High-Risk Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Is surgery still the preferred option for coronary revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary disease?

Authors:  A Kapur; I S Malik
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the stent era: a prospective study of all 9890 consecutive patients operated on in Scotland over a two year period.

Authors:  J P Pell; D Walsh; J Norrie; G Berg; A D Colquhoun; K Davidson; H Eteiba; A Faichney; A Flapan; K J Hogg; R R Jeffrey; K Jennings; J McArthur; P Mankad; K Oldroyd; A C Pell; I R Starkey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Revascularisation in diabetics with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  K J Beatt; K P Morgan; A Kapur
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI.

Authors:  Tassilo Bonzel; Volker Schächinger; Hilmar Dörge
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Outcomes of revascularization strategies for two-vessel coronary artery disease involving the proximal left anterior descending artery in an era of improved pharmacotherapy and stenting.

Authors:  Jaroslav Hubacek; Sunil Kalla; P Diane Galbraith; Michelle M Graham; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 9.  Revascularization therapy for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  J M Wilson; J J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1995

Review 10.  Percutaneous versus surgical interventions for coronary artery disease in those with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ozlem Soran
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.