Literature DB >> 8088130

Do we know how to screen for gestational diabetes? Current practice in one regional health authority.

C Nelson-Piercy1, E A Gale.   

Abstract

To review current practice for screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) in the North East Thames health region, clinical directors and other relevant individuals in all 17 obstetric units within NE Thames were interviewed personally. Additional information was obtained from local midwives, diabetologists, and chemical pathologists. Thirteen centres had a formal policy for screening and diagnosis of GDM. One centre ran two policies. Six of 18 centres performed a routine blood glucose (BG) screen on all pregnant women, proceeding to OGTT either on the basis of raised BG alone (3 centres), or on the basis of raised BG and/or clinical risk factors (3 centres). Of the remainder, 10 performed a diagnostic test (OGTT or equivalent) in all those with risk factors, and 2 via an intermediate screening BG. The choice and interpretation of screening and diagnostic tests varied considerably. Six centres used random BG, with cut-off ranging from > 5.8 mmol l-1 to > 9.0 mmol l-1, one used a single fasting BG > 5.0 mmol l-1, and another a 50 g oral glucose challenge (1 h level > 8.0 mmol l-1). Diagnosis of GDM was based on a 75 g (13 centres) or a 50 g OGTT (2 centres), while 1 used a standard mixed meal, and another a timed post-prandial glucose sample. Timing of tests ranged from booking to 36 weeks gestation and the diagnostic cut-off levels for GDM varied (fasting: 5.0-8.0 mmol l-1; 2 h: 6.0-10.1 mmol l-1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8088130     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00313.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  3 in total

Review 1.  The management of diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  D R Hadden
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Screening for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy: analysis of two screening protocols and review of current methods.

Authors:  R T Hearty; A I Traub; D R Hadden
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2000-05

3.  A standardised breakfast tolerance test in pregnancy: comparison with the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in unselected mothers and in those with impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  R N Roberts; J McManus; S Dobbs; D R Hadden
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1997-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.