Literature DB >> 8086844

How an ethics workshop for preceptors affects medical students.

B K Hennen1, J Morrissy, A Grindrod.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a workshop on medical ethics attended by family medicine preceptors would affect their students' learning of ethics, and what educational and experiential factors affected the students' learning about ethics.
DESIGN: A 3-hour workshop planned by a group of family physicians and ethicists and taught by a faculty member and an ethicist was offered to family physician preceptors. Students entering the clerkship were invited by letter to complete written answers to two clinical papers. Their answers were compared with "ideal" answers based on a weighted composite of the responses of 12 family physicians with a particular interest in ethics. The scores of students assigned to preceptors who had been offered the workshop were compared with those of students assigned to a control group of preceptors. Clerks were also asked about influences on their answers. PARTICIPANTS: The 86 preceptors participating in the family medicine programs at the University of Western Ontario, divided by random selection within geographic clustering into an experimental group of 50 and a control group of 36. Preceptors offered the workshop were considered to be in the experimental group whether or not they attended. The student questionnaire was sent to all students entering the family medicine clerkship program in the academic year 1989-1990 and some in the following year, until sufficient responses were received. Responses were analyzed from 32 clerks in the experimental group and 36 in the control group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Performance of students whose preceptors were invited to the workshop against performance of students whose preceptors were not invited to the workshop.
RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between the performance of students whose preceptors were offered the workshop and those whose preceptors were not.
CONCLUSION: The single outcome measure and the volunteer bias make conclusions difficult to draw. Further studies varying interventions and outcome measures are warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8086844      PMCID: PMC2380146     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  16 in total

1.  Joint statement on terminal illness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Code of ethics: CMA policy summary.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Student-directed teaching of medical ethics at a Canadian medical school.

Authors:  R S Hayward; W G Honer
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1985-05

4.  Relevance and utility of courses in medical ethics. A survey of physicians' perceptions.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino; R J Hart; S R Henderson; S E Loeb; G Edwards
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-01-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Teaching medical ethics.

Authors:  M D Jewell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-08-11

6.  A data base for curriculum design in medical ethics.

Authors:  R G Tiberius; D Cleave-Hogg
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1984-06

7.  Attitudes of medical students to medical ethics in their curriculum.

Authors:  A A Olukoya
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Family medicine and medical ethics--a natural and necessary union.

Authors:  R L Dickman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Introducing medical students to ethical issues.

Authors:  P J Thung
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Ethical decision making by family physicians.

Authors:  R Dayringer; R E Paiva; G W Davidson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 0.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.