Literature DB >> 8085615

Morphological adaptation to diet in platyrrhine primates.

F Anapol1, S Lee.   

Abstract

Morphological features of the jaws and teeth are examined in eight species of platyrrhine monkeys that coexist in the Suriname rainforest. Z-scores calculated from geometric predictions for several features of the feeding apparatus thought to have some functional significance (e.g., tooth dimensions, jaw robusticity, leverage of primary jaw elevators) are compared to a profile of the naturalistic dietary behavior of these species (i.e., proportions of fruit mesocarp, seeds, leaves, and fauna eaten). Several features are found exclusively in those platyrrhines whose dietary preferences are the most limited. Such specializations appear to be associated with a particular protein source exploited by a species to supplement a largely frugivorous diet. Ateles paniscus, which feeds primarily on the mesocarp of ripe fruit, has an adaptive morphology that emphasizes broad incisors. Chiropotes satanas (and to a slightly lesser extent, Pithecia pithecia) is a frugivore/seed predator with large upper and lower canines and a robust mandible. The frugivore/folivore Alouatta seniculus has a relatively large total molar area and effective mandibular condyle height. In all four of these strictly vegetarian species, the leverage of the masseter muscle is greater than that of temporalis. Of the omnivorous species, Cebus apella and C. nigrivittatus exploit both fauna and seeds for protein and exhibit an array of many of the above features, such as large teeth and thick mandibles. Saimiri sciureus, not particularly known for seed predation, departs from Cebus in having less robust canines and a more gracile mandible. All three cebid omnivores have a temporalis with greater leverage than the masseter, indicating a requirement for resisting anteriorly directed forces, for example, using the jaws for vigorous foraging. The lack of any enlarged features, other than incisors, in the omnivorous Saguinus midas may be attributable to the functional constraints of small body size. Because the small size of the gape limits the size of the food parcel ingested, a requirement to enlarge other dentomandibular structures for trituration is alleviated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085615     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330940208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  11 in total

1.  An extinct monkey from Haiti and the origins of the Greater Antillean primates.

Authors:  Siobhán B Cooke; Alfred L Rosenberger; Samuel Turvey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mandibular morphometric variation among Chinese cercopithecoids and the unique structure of the snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus) mandible.

Authors:  Ruliang Pan; Xeulong Jiang; Nick Milne
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 2.163

3.  A preliminary analysis of the relationship between jaw-muscle architecture and jaw-muscle electromyography during chewing across primates.

Authors:  Christopher J Vinyard; Andrea B Taylor
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Jaw-muscle fiber architecture in tufted capuchins favors generating relatively large muscle forces without compromising jaw gape.

Authors:  Andrea B Taylor; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  The effect of dietary adaption on cranial morphological integration in capuchins (order Primates, genus Cebus).

Authors:  Jana Makedonska; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Ecomorphospace occupation of large herbivorous dinosaurs from Late Jurassic through to Late Cretaceous time in North America.

Authors:  Taia Wyenberg-Henzler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Biting mechanics and niche separation in a specialized clade of primate seed predators.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Theodora H Y Luk; Jonathan M G Perry; Dimitri Neaux; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Scale issues in the study of primate foraging: red colobus of Kibale National Park.

Authors:  Colin A Chapman; Lauren J Chapman; Thomas R Gillespie
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  The bifidobacterial distribution in the microbiome of captive primates reflects parvorder and feed specialization of the host.

Authors:  Nikol Modrackova; Adam Stovicek; Johanna Burtscher; Petra Bolechova; Jiri Killer; Konrad J Domig; Vera Neuzil-Bunesova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Skull ecomorphology of megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the dinosaur park formation (upper campanian) of Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Jordan C Mallon; Jason S Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.