Literature DB >> 8085218

The accuracy and precision of the "Demirjian system" when used for age determination in Chinese children.

P J Davis1, U Hägg.   

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of a method devised for estimation of chronological age based on tooth formation (Demirjian et al 1973) using its latest standards (Demirjian 1982, 1986) were investigated using 204 panelipses obtained from a randomised sample of 5-7 year old Chinese children. The precision was found to be high but the accuracy was low. The mean difference between dental age and true age of the Chinese children was 11 and 7 months in boys and girls, respectively. The 95 per cent confidence interval was about +/- 15 months in both sexes. The results indicate that Demirjian's method cannot be used to accurately estimate chronologic age of Chinese children of this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swed Dent J        ISSN: 0347-9994


  18 in total

1.  Non-adult dental age assessment: correspondence analysis and linear regression versus Bayesian predictions.

Authors:  J Braga; Y Heuze; O Chabadel; N K Sonan; A Gueramy
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  The "blind age assessment": applicability of Greulich and Pyle, Demirjian and Mincer aging methods to a population of unknown ethnic origin.

Authors:  M Pechnikova; D Gibelli; D De Angelis; F de Santis; C Cattaneo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Accuracy of four dental age estimation methods in southern Indian children.

Authors:  Rezwana Begum Mohammed; Praveen Sanghvi; Kiran Kumar Perumalla; D Srinivasaraju; Jami Srinivas; U Siva Kalyan; Sk Md Iftekhar Rasool
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-01-01

4.  Predictive accuracy of Demirjian's, Modified Demirjian's and India specific dental age estimation methods in Odisha (Eastern Indian) population.

Authors:  I Mohanty; S Panda; R P Dalai; N Mohanty
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2019-05-01

5.  Estimating age and the probability of being at least 18 years of age using third molars: a comparison between Black and White individuals living in South Africa.

Authors:  André Uys; H Bernitz; S Pretorius; M Steyn
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Dental maturity of Caucasian children in the Indianapolis area.

Authors:  Lauren S Weddell; James K Hartsfield
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.874

7.  Dental age assessment: are Demirjian's standards appropriate for southern Chinese children?

Authors:  J Jayaraman; N M King; G J Roberts; H M Wong
Journal:  J Forensic Odontostomatol       Date:  2011-12-01

8.  Dental age of children and adolescents with impacted maxillary canines.

Authors:  Anand Sajnani; Nigel King
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Reliability of third molar development for age estimation in Gujarati population: A comparative study.

Authors:  Neha Gandhi; Sandeep Jain; Manish Kumar; Pratik Rupakar; Kanaram Choyal; Seema Prajapati
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2015 May-Aug

10.  A Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Age Estimation Methods Based on Panoramic Radiography of Developing Teeth.

Authors:  Shahrzad Javadinejad; Hajar Sekhavati; Roshanak Ghafari
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-06-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.