Literature DB >> 8085179

Longitudinal statistics of mental health care in Germany.

W Rössler1, H J Salize.   

Abstract

In 1975, an expert committee was commissioned by the government to evaluate psychiatric care in the Federal Republic of Germany. The results of this study showed that Germany lacked the infrastructure to provide appropriate care for the mentally ill. Since then, measures have been taken to improve in-patient, out-patient and non-hospital care. However, in spite of these efforts, problems still exist. A closer analysis revealed that, though state mental hospitals have consolidated their position in in-patient care, there are still few psychiatric departments in general hospitals. Also, there are extreme regional differences regarding non-hospital care as seen by the varying number of long-term inpatients in each region. Out-patient care, especially for the chronically mentally ill, is also widely criticized. However, the biggest problem remains that of financing psychiatric care. Because most mentally ill persons are not properly insured and depend on social welfare, the burden falls on the government. In addition to this, efforts to modernize the antiquated mental health care system in the former East Germany are especially costly. In the future, a larger part of the available resources will go to providing community-based care in East Germany, which was nonexistent before unification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085179     DOI: 10.1007/bf00796490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  6 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of case management services for severely mentally disabled clients.

Authors:  P Solomon
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1992-06

Review 2.  Case management for the mentally ill: looking at the evidence.

Authors:  F Holloway
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  1991

3.  [Psychiatric reform at the expense of chronic patients? Trends in the institutional care of chronic psychiatric patients in England, the United States, and the Federal Republic of Germany (author's transl)].

Authors:  H Kunze
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  Is case management effective for people with serious mental illness? A research review.

Authors:  A Rubin
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  1992-05

5.  [Sociopsychological services in the Federal Republic of Germany--a survey].

Authors:  W Rössler
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  1992-01

6.  Does case management reduce the rehospitalization rate?

Authors:  W Rössler; W Löffler; B Fätkenheuer; A Riecher-Rössler
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.392

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Psychiatric training in Germany.

Authors:  F Hohagen; S Treichel; M Berger
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Predictors of clinical and social outcomes after hospitalization in schizophrenia.

Authors:  P R Menezes; L C Rodrigues; A H Mann
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  [Individual needs and allocation of home-based community psychiatric services. Analysis of an example for ambulatory care living].

Authors:  M Leisse; Th W Kallert
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.