Literature DB >> 8083789

Comparison of DNA probe and ELISA microbial analysis methods and their association with adult periodontitis.

W L Melvin1, D A Assad, G A Miller, M E Gher, L Simonson, A K York.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were two-fold: to compare the DNA probe and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) microbial identification tests and correlate the levels of microorganisms with adult periodontitis. A single plaque sample were taken from each of 2 sites in 52 patients. Twelve of these patients were also sampled during and after treatment. The experimental site had clinical indicators of disease (bleeding on probing, probing and attachment loss of > or = 6 mm) and the contralateral site (control) was clinically healthy. A total of 176 plaque samples were collected, divided, processed, and sent for both types of quantitative microbial analyses. All of these samples were used to compare the DNA probe and ELISA methods while only the initial 104 pretreatment sites were used to correlate microorganisms/method with clinical indicators of adult periodontitis. DNA probes were used to assay for A. actinomycetemcomitans, P. gingivalis, P. intermedia, E. corrodens, F. nucleatum, T. denticola, and C. rectus. An ELISA utilizing monoclonal antibodies was used to assay for P. gingivalis, E. corrodens, T. denticola, and C. rectus. Comparison of the two methods revealed that the ELISA test identified P. gingivalis and C. rectus significantly more often than the DNA probe method and that T. denticola was detected more frequently with the DNA probe. The sensitivities and specificities varied widely among organisms and by test. P. gingivalis, as identified by ELISA, had the highest degree of sensitivity and specificity (0.90 and 0.82 respectively) to clinical indicators of adult periodontitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8083789     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1994.65.6.576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative real-time PCR for Porphyromonas gingivalis and total bacteria.

Authors:  S R Lyons; A L Griffen; E J Leys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Porphyromonas gingivalis strain variability and periodontitis.

Authors:  A L Griffen; S R Lyons; M R Becker; M L Moeschberger; E J Leys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Differential cytokine patterns in mouse macrophages and gingival fibroblasts after stimulation with porphyromonas gingivalis or Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Katy J Jones; Sanaz Ekhlassi; Dina Montufar-Solis; John R Klein; Jeremy S Schaefer
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 4.  Periodontal disease as a specific, albeit chronic, infection: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  W J Loesche; N S Grossman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Age and prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis in children.

Authors:  D L McClellan; A L Griffen; E J Leys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prevalence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and periodontal health status.

Authors:  A L Griffen; M R Becker; S R Lyons; M L Moeschberger; E J Leys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Invasive differences among Porphyromonas gingivalis strains from healthy and diseased periodontal sites.

Authors:  K A Jandik; M Bélanger; S L Low; B R Dorn; M C K Yang; A Progulske-Fox
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.