Literature DB >> 8082071

Utility of embolization or chemoembolization as second-line treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal carcinoma.

D J Martinelli1, S Wadler, C W Bakal, J Cynamon, A Rozenblit, H Haynes, R Kaleya, P H Wiernik.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Second-line therapy of patients with colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver is unsatisfactory. One alternative to systemic treatment is therapy directed locoregionally.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients with unresectable colorectal cancer with bulky liver metastases who had failed prior systemic therapy were randomized to treatment with either embolization or chemoembolization. For the embolization group, particulate transcatheter polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) (150-250-microns particles) mixed with full-strength iodinated radiographic contrast was administered under direct fluoroscopic control. In patients randomized to chemoembolization, 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m2) and recombinant alpha-2a-interferon (Roche Laboratories, Nutley, NJ) (9-MU) were thoroughly mixed into the PVA contrast suspension. Study end points were response to therapy and survival.
RESULTS: Of 24 patients, 13 were randomized to chemoembolization and 11 to embolization therapy. All were assessable for toxicity, response, and complications. Among the first 13 patients treated initially, a suppurative abscess developed in one patient, who died. Eleven subsequent patients were pretreated with oral and intravenous antibiotics without further infectious complications. Five patients had hemorrhagic complications, two of which were serious. The treatment was otherwise well tolerated, with most patients experiencing transient pain, fevers, and elevations in leukocyte counts and liver enzymes, which resolved spontaneously. Computed tomography scans of the liver were used to assess patient response to therapy. There were 6 responders (25%) among the 24 patients treated. No differences in response to treatment or survival between the embolization and chemoembolization groups were noted. With a median follow-up of more than 12 months, the median survival was 9.3 months from the time of embolization therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Embolization and chemoembolization therapy appear to have antitumor activity as second-line therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma with bulky liver metastases. Although generally well tolerated, complications of this therapy may be severe. The addition of further patients to this trial will allow a rigorous comparison of embolization alone versus embolization with chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8082071     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1706::aid-cncr2820740611>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  14 in total

1.  [Intra-arterial treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  O Pellerin; J-F Geschwind
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-01

Review 2.  Colorectal liver metastases: regional chemotherapy via transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and hepatic chemoperfusion: an update.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Danny Yakoub; Mohamed Nabil
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Transarterial (chemo)embolisation versus no intervention or placebo for liver metastases.

Authors:  Mateusz J Swierz; Dawid Storman; Robert P Riemsma; Robert Wolff; Jerzy W Mitus; Michal Pedziwiatr; Jos Kleijnen; Malgorzata M Bala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-03-12

4.  Combining systemic chemotherapy with chemoembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yau-Tong You; Chung-Rong Changchien; Jen-Seng Huang; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  [Transarterial chemoembolization of liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma using degradable starch microspheres (Spherex): personal investigations and review of the literature].

Authors:  K Wasser; F Giebel; R Fischbach; H Tesch; P Landwehr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Evaluation of different calibrated spherical polyvinyl alcohol microspheres in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: VX2 tumor model in rabbit liver.

Authors:  Kwang-Hun Lee; Eleni Liapi; Veronica Prieto Ventura; Manon Buijs; Josephina A Vossen; Mustafa Vali; Jean-Francois H Geschwind
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 7.  Liver embolizations in oncology: a review. Part I. Arterial (chemo)embolizations.

Authors:  Peter Gunvén
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Electrocoagulation for liver metastases.

Authors:  Dawid Storman; Mateusz J Swierz; Robert P Riemsma; Robert Wolff; Jerzy W Mitus; Michal Pedziwiatr; Jos Kleijnen; Malgorzata M Bala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-28

9.  Colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Ashraf J Haddad; Murad Bani Hani; Timothy M Pawlik; Steven C Cunningham
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-06-06

10.  Repetitive transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) of liver metastases from renal cell carcinoma: local control and survival results.

Authors:  Mohamed Nabil; Tatjana Gruber; Danny Yakoub; Hanns Ackermann; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.