Literature DB >> 8081346

The Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM): a tool for early evaluation of severely brain-injured patients.

M A Rader1, D W Ellis.   

Abstract

There has been little definitive research ono the efficacy of sensory stimulation, yet many brain-injury rehabilitation programmes offer some form of it as treatment for severely injured patients. In general, however, sensory stimulation programmes and outcome studies alike lack precise definitions of terms, consistent criteria of patient selection, and valid and reliable measures of response to treatment. The Sensory Stimulation Assessment Measure (SSAM) was developed as a neuropsychological approach that provides a reliable and valid measure of responsiveness in patients who can neither communicate nor consistently follow commands. Patient responses are divided into three six-point behavioural scales (Eye Opening, Motor, and Vocalization) that require little evaluator subjectivity or inference. The measure may be used in treatment planning and is designed to address the rigorous demands of scientific research. Validity, reliability, and normative data are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8081346     DOI: 10.3109/02699059409150982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Inj        ISSN: 0269-9052            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

Review 1.  The vegetative and minimally conscious states: a review of the literature and preliminary survey of prevalence in Ireland.

Authors:  M Ní Lochlainn; S Gubbins; S Connolly; R B Reilly
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Aurore Thibaut; Gustave Moonen; Steven Laureys
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; Douglas I Katz; Nicholas D Schiff; John Whyte; Eric J Ashman; Stephen Ashwal; Richard Barbano; Flora M Hammond; Steven Laureys; Geoffrey S F Ling; Risa Nakase-Richardson; Ronald T Seel; Stuart Yablon; Thomas S D Getchius; Gary S Gronseth; Melissa J Armstrong
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 4.  Addressing neuropsychiatric disturbances during rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: current and future methods.

Authors:  David B Arciniegas
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 5.986

Review 5.  Clinimetric measurement in traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  J A Opara; E Małecka; J Szczygiel
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-06-25

6.  The Early Functional Abilities (EFA) scale to assess neurological and neurosurgical early rehabilitation patients.

Authors:  Ariane Hankemeier; Jens D Rollnik
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  Are visual functions diagnostic signs of the minimally conscious state? an integrative review.

Authors:  Berno U H Overbeek; Henk J Eilander; Jan C M Lavrijsen; Raymond T C M Koopmans
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 8.  Diagnostic Developments in Differentiating Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and the Minimally Conscious State.

Authors:  Camillo Porcaro; Idan Efim Nemirovsky; Francesco Riganello; Zahra Mansour; Antonio Cerasa; Paolo Tonin; Bobby Stojanoski; Andrea Soddu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.