Literature DB >> 8081086

Bilateral and unilateral gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) are not equivalent therapies if unilateral GIFT is chosen to avoid one abnormal tube.

D B Shapiro1, J R Nelson, F R Batzer, B Gocial, K J Go, G Maislin, S L Corson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relative effectiveness of bilateral and unilateral gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) was compared. Bilateral GIFT, where possible, was the preferred method of transfer and occurred in 328 patients. One hundred sixty-seven patients undergoing unilateral GIFT were placed into one of seven categories based on the indication for unilateral GIFT. Three categories included patients with either historical or laparoscopic evidence of unilateral tubal abnormalities, two categories included patients without tubal disease, and two categories contained patients in whom the physician could not choose between unilateral or bilateral GIFT.
RESULTS: Results demonstrate that unilateral GIFT in patients with either historical or laparoscopic evidence of unilateral tubal disease had significantly lower pregnancy and implantation rates than patients undergoing bilateral GIFT or those undergoing unilateral GIFT without evidence of tubal disease (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The presence of unilateral tubal abnormalities predicts a lower likelihood of pregnancy in patients undergoing unilateral GIFT through the tube presumed to be normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8081086     DOI: 10.1007/bf01204359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of unilateral and bilateral tubal transfer in gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT).

Authors:  A S Penzias; M M Alper; S P Oskowitz; M J Berger; I E Thompson
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1991-10

2.  Outcome in 242 in vitro fertilization-embryo replacement or gamete intrafallopian transfer-induced pregnancies.

Authors:  S L Corson; R P Dickey; B Gocial; F R Batzer; E Eisenberg; L Huppert; G Maislin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Unilateral gamete intrafallopian transfer: the preferred method?

Authors:  C J Haines; R T O'Shea
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Programmed gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT).

Authors:  R G Bates; P M Fielding; K S Lindsay; N J White; D K Edmonds
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1988-12

5.  Gamete intra-Fallopian transfer: evaluation of 100 consecutive attempts.

Authors:  P Braeckmans; P Devroey; M Camus; I Khan; C Staessen; J Smitz; L Van Waesberghe; A Wisanto; A C Van Steirteghem
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Predicting success of gamete intrafallopian transfer.

Authors:  J R Nelson; S L Corson; F R Batzer; B Gocial; L Huppert; K J Go; G Maislin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.329

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Factors associated with improving success rates with gamete intrafallopian transfer under thin-needle spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  P D Silva; A L Meisch; J K Meisch; S B Kang; B Rooney
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.412

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.