Literature DB >> 8081066

Protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting.

J S Cottrell1.   

Abstract

A mass spectrum of the peptide mixture resulting from the digestion of a protein by an enzyme can provide a fingerprint of great specificity--so specific, in fact, that it is often possible to identify the protein from this information alone, without ambiguity. The general approach is to take a small sample of the protein of interest and digest it with a proteolytic enzyme, such as trypsin. The resulting digest mixture is analyzed by mass spectrometry, the ionization techniques of choice being matrix-assisted laser desorption or electrospray ionization. The experimental mass values are then compared with a database of peptide mass values, calculated by applying the enzyme cleavage rules to the entries in one of the major collections of sequence data, such as SwissProt or PIR. By using an appropriate scoring algorithm, the closest match or matches can be identified. If the "unknown" protein was present in the sequence database, then the goal is to identify that precise entry. If the sequence database does not contain the unknown protein, then a successful search will identify those entries that exhibit the closest sequence homology, often equivalent proteins from related species. An inverted strategy, in which experimental peptide mass fingerprints are accumulated in a database, has significant potential for identifying coding regions within sequence data from genomic DNA and, in doing so, correlating the genes with their expressed proteins. This review aims to provide an overview of the technique, compare the different database matching algorithms which have been described in the literature, and discuss the practical and theoretical factors which influence identification accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8081066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pept Res        ISSN: 1040-5704


  16 in total

1.  Obtaining more accurate Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass measurements without internal standards using multiply charged ions.

Authors:  J E Bruce; G A Anderson; M D Brands; L Pasa-Tolic; R D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Scoring methods in MALDI peptide mass fingerprinting: ChemScore, and the ChemApplex program.

Authors:  Kenneth C Parker
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 3.  Mass spectrometry innovations in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  D I Papac; Z Shahrokh
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Effect of water-soluble fraction of cigarette smoke on human aortic endothelial cells--a proteomic approach.

Authors:  M Raveendran; D Senthil; B Utama; Y Shen; J Wang; Y Zhang; X L Wang
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.691

5.  Sulfonation chemistry as a powerful tool for MALDI TOF/TOF de novo sequencing and post-translational modification analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Conrotto; Ulf Hellman
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2005-12

6.  Challenges and Opportunities for Biological Mass Spectrometry Core Facilities in the Developing World.

Authors:  Liam Bell; Bridget Calder; Reinhard Hiller; Ashwil Klein; Nelson C Soares; Stoyan H Stoychev; Barend C Vorster; David L Tabb
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2018-03-23

7.  Colonic bacteria express an ulcerative colitis pANCA-related protein epitope.

Authors:  O Cohavy; D Bruckner; L K Gordon; R Misra; B Wei; M E Eggena; S R Targan; J Braun
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Liquid chromatography and electrospray mass spectrometric mapping of peptides from human plasma filtrate.

Authors:  M Raida; P Schulz-Knappe; G Heine; W G Forssmann
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  Differential peptidomics assessment of strain and age differences in mice in response to acute cocaine administration.

Authors:  Elena V Romanova; Stanislav S Rubakhin; John R Ossyra; Jonathan A Zombeck; Michael R Nosek; Jonathan V Sweedler; Justin S Rhodes
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 5.372

10.  Proteomic analyses of the vitreous humour.

Authors:  Martina Angi; Helen Kalirai; Sarah E Coupland; Bertil E Damato; Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.