Literature DB >> 8076718

Predicting pure tone thresholds in normal and hearing-impaired ears with distortion product emission and age.

B P Kimberley1, I Hernadi, A M Lee, D K Brown.   

Abstract

Distortion product emission (DPE) growth functions, demographic data, and pure tone thresholds were recorded in 229 normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. Half of the data set (115 ears) was used by a discriminant analysis routine to classify DPE and demographic features into either a normal pure tone threshold (PTT) group or an impaired PTT group (PTT greater than 30 dB SPL) at six frequencies in the audiometric range. The six discriminant functions developed from this classification process were then used to predict pure tone threshold group membership in the remaining 114-ear data set. Frequency-specific prediction accuracy varied from 71% (correct classification of hearing impairment at 1025 Hz) to 92% (correct classification of normal hearing at 2050 Hz). Of the 45 DPE and demographic variables evaluated, the DPE amplitude associated with an f2 of moderate level (50 dB SPL) and a frequency corresponding to pure tone threshold was generally most predictive. DPE level was found to be weakly correlated with subject age and perhaps for this reason age was frequently included in discriminant functions. For our data, discriminant functions with one variable, two variables, or 5-10 variables showed no differences in predictive performance. This research suggests that DPE measures can reliably categorize pure tone thresholds as normal or impaired in large populations with varied cochlear hearing status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8076718     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199406000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Measuring of distortion product otoacoustic emissions using multiple tone pairs.

Authors:  Ioannis Kastanioudakis; Nausica Ziavra; Dimitrios Anastasopoulos; Antonios Skevas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Darcia M Dierking; Tiffany A Johnson; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions: the loss of amplitude is primarily caused by age-related hearing loss and not by aging alone.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Katrin Gudmundsdottir; Peter Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  On a possible prognostic value of otoacoustic emissions: a study on patients with sudden hearing loss.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emissions in two species of kangaroo rats: implications for auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  L A Shaffer; G R Long
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  How well can centenarians hear?

Authors:  Zhongping Mao; Lijun Zhao; Lichun Pu; Mingxiao Wang; Qian Zhang; David Z Z He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparative multivariate analyses of transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Mirela Cristina Stamate; Nicolae Todor; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-11-15

8.  Age related changes to the dynamics of contralateral DPOAE suppression in human subjects.

Authors:  Ujimoto Konomi; Sohit Kanotra; Adrian L James; Robert V Harrison
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-06-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.