Literature DB >> 8075966

Analysis of early and late deaths on RTOG non-small cell carcinoma of the lung trials: comparison with CALGB 8433.

R Komaki1, T F Pajak, R W Byhardt, B Emami, S O Asbell, M Roach, J E Pedersen, W J Curran, P Lattin, A H Russell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In a major study that showed a treatment advantage for induction chemotherapy followed by radiation therapy (CALGB 8433), there was a significantly (P = 0.02) lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days of registration in the chemotherapy/radiation arm than the radiation therapy arm; without this difference, the overall survival was marginally better (P = 0.059) for the chemotherapy/radiation group. A retrospective analysis of RTOG trials sought explanations for the phenomenon.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who fit the CALGB eligibility criteria and received radiation therapy alone in four prospective trials of the RTOG conducted between 1983 and 1989 were analyzed to determine factors that distinguished patients dying within 105 days from longer survivors. Two were trials of altered fractionation and two used standard fractionation. Of 683 patients identified, 107 (15.7%) died within 105 days after registration. The log linear model was used to evaluate relationships between death within 105 days and known prognostic factors. Karnofsky performance status (KPS), < 90 vs. > or = 90, was the only factor significantly related to death within 105 days (P = 0.0052). A Cox model with the same factors plus fractionation and total dose found KPS and T-stage associated with overall survival (P = 0.0005 and 0.025, respectively). The choice of the hyperfractionation arm (HFX) for Phase III study (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy b.i.d.) was based in part on comparison with standard fractionation (STD) from a concurrent RTOG protocol, 8321. Review of early deaths showed that this HFX arm had a lower proportion of patients dying within 105 days (7.9%) than STD in 8321 (21.0%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8075966     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5002(93)90179-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  5 in total

1.  A Validated Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Is Predictive of Cancer Progression and Mortality.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; Eva Culakova; Gary H Lyman; Charles Francis; Anna Falanga; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-04-28

2.  A new simplified comorbidity score as a prognostic factor in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: description and comparison with the Charlson's index.

Authors:  B Colinet; W Jacot; D Bertrand; S Lacombe; M-C Bozonnat; J-P Daurès; J-L Pujol
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Brain metastases at the time of presentation of non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-centric AERIO analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  W Jacot; X Quantin; J M Boher; F Andre; L Moreau; M Gainet; A Depierre; E Quoix; T L Chevalier; J L Pujol
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Identification of patients at risk for early death after conventional chemotherapy in solid tumours and lymphomas.

Authors:  I Ray-Coquard; H Ghesquière; T Bachelot; C Borg; P Biron; C Sebban; A LeCesne; F Chauvin; J Y Blay
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Serum HE4: An Independent Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Pierre-Jean Lamy; Carine Plassot; Jean-Louis Pujol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.