Literature DB >> 8075553

Does CTAP prior to hepatic resection improve patient survival rates?

L S Langmo1, A P Dagher, W B Mehard, W C Small, J P Heiken, E K Fishman, M E Bernardino.   

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to compare survival rates of colon carcinoma patients who had undergone attempted curative hepatic resection based on liver staging by computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or portography (CTAP) with previously reported survival rates of patients who underwent similar surgery without preoperative CTAP evaluations. A total of 404 CTAP studies performed at three institutions were reviewed. Of this group, 197 had colon carcinoma. Sixty-nine of the colon patients went to surgery. Actuarial adjusted yearly survival rates were calculated for the prior CTAP colon group and compared to historical controls. The control survival data were taken from reports published prior to the CTAP era. Our study demonstrated no difference in the 1-year survival data between the groups. However, the CTAP patients had greater survival in years 2-4. This greater survival may be multifactorial but in part due to better surgical selection caused by CTAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8075553     DOI: 10.1007/bf00198187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  19 in total

1.  Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver.

Authors:  A Prando; S Wallace; M E Bernardino; M M Lindell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Management of metastatic cancer to the liver.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; N Kemeny
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1989

3.  Hepatic metastases in perspective.

Authors:  M A Adson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  A prospective evaluation of hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group Protocol 6584.

Authors:  G Steele; R Bleday; R J Mayer; A Lindblad; N Petrelli; D Weaver
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Detection of focal hepatic masses: prospective evaluation with CT, delayed CT, CT during arterial portography, and MR imaging.

Authors:  J P Heiken; P J Weyman; J K Lee; D M Balfe; D Picus; E M Brunt; M W Flye
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Hepatic tumors: comparison of CT during arterial portography, delayed CT, and MR imaging for preoperative evaluation.

Authors:  R C Nelson; J L Chezmar; P H Sugarbaker; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Preoperative determination of the resectability of hepatic tumors: efficacy of CT during arterial portography.

Authors:  W C Small; W B Mehard; L S Langmo; A P Dagher; E K Fishman; J P Heiken; M E Bernardino
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Hepatic resection for secondary neoplasms.

Authors:  C E Morrow; T B Grage; D E Sutherland; J S Najarian
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M A Adson; J A van Heerden; M H Adson; J S Wagner; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1984-06

10.  Computed tomographic arteriography of the liver.

Authors:  P C Freeny; W M Marks
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Detection of liver neoplasms: techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  R L Baron
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.