Literature DB >> 8074599

Patient-carried card prompts vs computer-generated prompts to remind private practice physicians to perform health maintenance measures.

R C Turner1, J G Peden, K O'Brien.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of a computer-generated prompt sheet placed on the front of patients' charts with a patient-carried prompt card to remind physicians to perform selected health maintenance items.
METHODS: A randomized prospective single-blind study was performed in private practice offices in rural eastern North Carolina, with 28 family practitioners and nine general internists participating. Twenty-two physicians were randomized to the computer prompt group and 22 to the card prompt group. Four physicians in the computer group did not complete the study because of computer software problems, and three physicians did not complete the study because their limited staff was unable to enter patient data into the computer. Before the intervention, 20 patient charts (10 males and 10 females) from each physician were audited for the performance of influenza vaccinations, stool for occult blood, pap smears, breast examinations performed by the physicians, and mammograms. One year after the intervention was instituted, chart audits for the above five items were done again on 20 different patient charts for each physician.
RESULTS: There was a 7% increase in the performance of influenza vaccinations in the card group (17% vs 24%) compared with a 6% increase in the computer group (20% vs 26%). There was a 5% decrease in the performance of stool for occult blood in the card group (28% vs 23%) compared with a 1% increase in the computer group (30% vs 31%). There was an 11% decrease in the performance of pap smears in the card group (26% vs 15%) compared with a 3% increase in the computer group (23% vs 26%). There was a 2% decrease in the performance of breast examinations by the physician in the card group (35% vs 33%) compared with a 3% increase in the computer group (30% vs 33%). Finally, there was a 3% increase in the performance of mammograms in the card group (22% vs 25%) compared with an 11% increase in the computer group (15% vs 26%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a greater increase in performance of health maintenance items in the computer-prompted group. The performance of stool for occult blood, pap smears, breast examinations performed by the physician, and mammograms were increased more in the computer-prompted group than in the card group. However, there was not a statistically significant difference after intervention for any of the audited health maintenance items for either the computer group or the card group. Overall, health maintenance measures were performed in only a minority of appropriate patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8074599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  15 in total

1.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

Review 2.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

4.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Missed opportunities for prevention in general internal medicine.

Authors:  R Brull; W A Ghali; H Quan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Impact of EHR-based clinical decision support on adherence to guidelines for patients on NSAIDs: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  James M Gill; Arch G Mainous; Richelle J Koopman; Marty S Player; Charles J Everett; Ying Xia Chen; James J Diamond; Michael I Lieberman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Implementing practice guidelines: a workshop on guidelines dissemination and implementation with a focus on asthma and COPD.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Boulet; Allan Becker; Dennis Bowie; Paul Hernandez; Andrew McIvor; Michel Rouleau; Jean Bourbeau; Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; France Légaré; Thomas F Ward; Robert L Cowie; Denis Drouin; Stewart B Harris; Robyn Tamblyn; Pierre Ernst; Wan C Tan; Martyn R Partridge; Philippe Godard; Carla T Herrerias; John W Wilson; Liz Stirling; Emily-Brynn Rozitis; Nancy Garvey; Diane Lougheed; Manon Labrecque; Renata Rea; Martin C Holroyde; Danielle Fagnan; Eileen Dorval; Lisa Pogany; Alan Kaplan; Lisa Cicutto; Mary L Allen; Serge Moraca; J Mark FitzGerald; Francine Borduas
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 9.  Patient reminder and patient recall systems to improve immunization rates.

Authors:  Julie C Jacobson Vann; Peter Szilagyi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-07-20

Review 10.  The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianfranco Damiani; Luigi Pinnarelli; Simona C Colosimo; Roberta Almiento; Lorella Sicuro; Rocco Galasso; Lorenzo Sommella; Walter Ricciardi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.