Literature DB >> 8074597

Treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcemia. Double-blind comparison of rapid and slow intravenous infusion regimens of pamidronate disodium and saline alone.

R Gucalp1, R Theriault, I Gill, S Madajewicz, R Chapman, R Navari, F Ahmann, K Zelenakas, M Heffernan, R D Knight.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the effects of 60-mg single doses of pamidronate disodium compared with saline alone in the treatment of cancer-associated hypercalcemia.
METHODS: After pretreatment hydration, patients with corrected serum calcium concentrations of 3.0 mmol/L (12 mg/dL) or greater secondary to cancer were randomized to double-blind treatment with a single infusion of pamidronate disodium, 60 mg, over either 4 or 24 hours or continued infusions of 0.9% saline alone (n = 23 per group). Corrected serum calcium levels were measured daily for 7 days of inpatient evaluation.
RESULTS: Response rates for both of the pamidronate regimens were significantly (P < .05) higher than that for saline alone. A complete response to treatment (corrected serum calcium concentration normalized) was observed for five (22%), 18 (78%), and 14 (61%) patients, respectively, who received saline alone, 4-hour infusion of pamidronate, and 24-hour infusion of pamidronate. There were no significant differences between the two pamidronate regimens. Median durations of complete response were 6, 6, and 11 days, respectively, and median times to relapse (includes complete plus partial responders and nonresponders) were 0, 7, and 7 days, respectively. Pamidronate was well tolerated as assessed by all clinical and laboratory measures, regardless of the time of infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: A 4-hour infusion of pamidronate disodium, 60 mg, was as safe and effective as a 24-hour infusion, and both were superior to saline alone in lowering corrected serum calcium concentrations in patients with cancer-associated hypercalcemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8074597     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.154.17.1935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Comparative tolerability of drug therapies for hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Authors:  N Zojer; A V Keck; M Pecherstorfer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Myeloma: update on supportive care strategies.

Authors:  Jesús F San Miguel; Ramón García-Sanz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-06

Review 5.  Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: An Update on Pathogenesis and Management.

Authors:  Aibek E Mirrakhimov
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11

6.  Bone targeted treatments in cancer - The story so far.

Authors:  Robert Coleman
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 4.072

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.