PURPOSE: To study the safety, technical efficacy, and histopathology of the ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) embolic mixture in an animal model. METHODS: Microcatheterization of the rete was performed in 29 swine. The clinical, angiographic, and histopathologic consequences of superselective injection of the two principal embolic mixture components (EVAL and dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) were evaluated. Necropsy and standard histologic preparation were used for pathologic analysis. RESULTS: Significant technical difficulties and adverse outcomes occurred. The EVAL mixture was difficult to see under fluoroscopy and prematurely polymerized during one embolization, resulting in catheter occlusion. However, polymerized EVAL did not adhere to the catheter. DMSO damaged the plastic hubs of the microcatheters. Infusions of DMSO always caused immediate, moderate to severe vasospasm and frequently caused either subarachnoid hemorrhage or stroke. Histopathologic findings of both DMSO and DMSO plus EVAL were similar, producing variable endothelial denuding, thrombosis, and disruption of internal elastic lamina in the acute stage. An intense, mixed inflammatory response, organized thrombus, and transmural necrosis with extravasation were seen in the subacute and chronic stages. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having some desirable features as an embolic agent, significant problems were encountered with EVAL; the most important of which is that one of the principal components of the embolic mixture, DMSO, seems to be very angiotoxic.
PURPOSE: To study the safety, technical efficacy, and histopathology of the ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) embolic mixture in an animal model. METHODS: Microcatheterization of the rete was performed in 29 swine. The clinical, angiographic, and histopathologic consequences of superselective injection of the two principal embolic mixture components (EVAL and dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) were evaluated. Necropsy and standard histologic preparation were used for pathologic analysis. RESULTS: Significant technical difficulties and adverse outcomes occurred. The EVAL mixture was difficult to see under fluoroscopy and prematurely polymerized during one embolization, resulting in catheter occlusion. However, polymerized EVAL did not adhere to the catheter. DMSO damaged the plastic hubs of the microcatheters. Infusions of DMSO always caused immediate, moderate to severe vasospasm and frequently caused either subarachnoid hemorrhage or stroke. Histopathologic findings of both DMSO and DMSO plus EVAL were similar, producing variable endothelial denuding, thrombosis, and disruption of internal elastic lamina in the acute stage. An intense, mixed inflammatory response, organized thrombus, and transmural necrosis with extravasation were seen in the subacute and chronic stages. CONCLUSIONS: Despite having some desirable features as an embolic agent, significant problems were encountered with EVAL; the most important of which is that one of the principal components of the embolic mixture, DMSO, seems to be very angiotoxic.
Authors: Edgar A Samaniego; Colin P Derdeyn; Minako Hayakawa; David Hasan; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2018-07-04 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Joachim Klisch; Lin Yin; Flavio Requejo; Barbara Eissner; Kai M Scheufler; Ralf Kubalek; Markus Buechner; Axel Pagenstecher; Heiner Nagursky; Martin Schumacher Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Zhao; C Zheng; G Feng; Y Zhao; H Liang; H Wu; G Zhou; B Liang; Y Wang; X Xia Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Dae Chul Suh; Kil Soo Kim; Soo Mee Lim; Hai Bin Shi; Choong Gon Choi; Ho Kyu Lee; Dong Man Seo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 3.825