Literature DB >> 8071684

Imaging of brain tumor proliferative activity with iodine-131-iododeoxyuridine.

J G Tjuvajev1, H A Macapinlac, F Daghighian, A M Scott, J Z Ginos, R D Finn, P Kothari, R Desai, J Zhang, B Beattie.   

Abstract

METHODS: Iodine-131-iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) uptake and retention was imaged with SPECT at 2 and 24 hr after administering a 10-mCi dose to six patients with primary brain tumors. The SPECT images were directly compared to gadolinium contrast-enhanced MR images as well as to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET scans and 201Tl SPECT scans.
RESULTS: Localized uptake and retention of IUdR-derived radioactivity was observed in five of six patients. The plasma half-life of [131I]IUdR was short (1.6 min) in comparison to the half-life of total plasma radioactivity (6.4 hr). The pattern of [131I]IUdR-derived radioactivity was markedly different in the 2-hr compared to 24-hr images. Radioactivity was localized along the periphery of the tumor and extended beyond the margin of tumor identified by contrast enhancement on MRI. The estimated levels of tumor radioactivity at 24 hr, based on semiquantitative phantom studies, ranged between < 0.1 and 0.2 microCi/cc (< 0.001% and 0.002% dose/cc); brain levels were not measurable.
CONCLUSIONS: Iodine-131-IUdR SPECT imaging of brain tumor proliferation has low (marginal) sensitivity due to low count rates and can detect only the most active regions of tumor growth. Imaging at 24 hr represents a washout strategy to reduce 131I-labeled metabolites contributing to background activity in the tumors, and is more likely to show the pattern of [131I]IUdR-DNA incorporation and thereby increase image specificity. Iodine-123-IUdR SPECT imaging at 12 hr and the use of [124I]IUdR and PET will improve count acquisition and image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8071684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

Review 1.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Brain white and gray matter anatomy of MRI segmentation based on tissue evaluation.

Authors:  Qussay A Salih; Abdul Rahman Ramli; Rozi Mahmud; Rahmita Wirza
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-06-28

3.  Is 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine a better marker for tumour response than (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose?

Authors:  Sven N Reske; Sandra Deisenhofer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Abdominal SPECT/MRI fusion applied to the study of splenic and hepatic uptake of radiolabeled thrombocytes and colloids.

Authors:  H K Pohjonen; S E Savolainen; P H Nikkinen; V P Poutanen; E T Korppi-Tommola; B K Liewendahl
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.668

5.  (99m)Tc-EC-guanine: synthesis, biodistribution, and tumor imaging in animals.

Authors:  David J Yang; Kaoru Ozaki; Chang-Sok Oh; Ali Azhdarinia; Thomas Yang; Megumi Ito; Allison Greenwell; Jerry Bryant; Saady Kohanim; Vincenzo K Wong; E Edmund Kim
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  The role of DNA synthesis imaging in cancer in the era of targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Sridhar Nimmagadda; Anthony F Shields
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  [11C]Methionine and [11C]PBR28 as PET Imaging Tracers to Differentiate Metastatic Tumor Recurrence or Radiation Necrosis.

Authors:  Thuy T Tran; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Lucia B Jilaveanu; Christopher Zito; Gabriela Turcu; Keunpoong Lim; Nabeel Nabulsi; Henry Huang; Anita Huttner; Harriet M Kluger; Veronica L Chiang; Richard Carson
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.488

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.