Literature DB >> 8068372

Practice guidelines and practical judgement: the role of mega-trials, meta-analysis and consensus.

B G Charlton.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 8068372      PMCID： PMC1238922     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN： 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Clinical trials and meta-analysis. What do they do for us?

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-07-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Medical practice and the double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Nonsensus consensus.

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The place of judgement in medicine.

Authors:  J McCormick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Medical practice guidelines: lessons from the United States.

Authors:  A Farmer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-31

6.  Development of guidelines for general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Three battles to watch in the 1990s.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Management of science.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Consensus conferences as drug promotion.

Authors:  T A Sheldon; G D Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials?

Authors:  S Yusuf; R Collins; R Peto
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.373
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Megatrials are based on a methodological mistake.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Policy priorities in diabetes care: a Delphi study.

Authors:  M Gallagher; C Bradshaw; H Nattress
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

3.  Evidence based medicine. Megatrials are subordinate to medical science.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-22

4.  Conveying the benefits and risks of treatment.

Authors:  T Fahey; J Newton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Anecdotes and empiricism.

Authors:  J Macnaughton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Clinical guidelines in 1994.

Authors:  G Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-03

7.  Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M O Roland; P G Shekelle; J A Cantrill; S A Buetow; D K Cragg
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-03

Review 8.  Mega-trials: methodological issues and clinical implications.

Authors:  B G Charlton
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.