Literature DB >> 8066524

Neurologic injury after insertion of laminar hooks during Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

H D Been1, C J Kalkman, H S Traast, B W Ongerboer de Visser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND DATA: Although the use of Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) instrumentation has improved results of operative treatment of scoliotic deformities, this technique may be associated with increased risk of neurologic injury. CASE HISTORIES: Two cases of neurologic complications immediately after insertion of lumbar laminar hooks during CD instrumentation for correction of scoliosis are reported.
METHODS: Between 1986 and 1992, the authors performed 220 CD instrumentations for various spinal deformities. All patients were monitored with posterior tibial nerve somatosensory cortical evoked potentials (PTN-SSEPs).
CONCLUSION: These cases demonstrate that caution should be exercised during introduction of laminar hooks on the concave side during CD instrumentation for scoliotic deformities. Continuous neurophysiologic monitoring of spinal cord conduction may aid in early detection of local compression at the spinal cord or cauda equina level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8066524     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.

Authors:  Wilbert van Laar; Rinse J Meester; Theo H Smit; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Pedicle screw instrumentation and spinal deformities: have we gone too far?

Authors:  John McCormick; Max Aebi; David Toby; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Spinal cord compression caused by the rod of a Harrington instrumentation device: a late complication in scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  A Krödel; J C Rehmet; C Hamburger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The potential risk of spinal cord injury from pedicle screw at the apex of adolescent idiopathic thoracic scoliosis: magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.

Authors:  Shoufeng Wang; Yong Qiu; Wenjun Liu; Benlong Shi; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Zezhang Zhu; Bangping Qian; Feng Zhu; Xu Sun
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Current concepts and controversies on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Part I.

Authors:  Alok Sud; Athanasios I Tsirikos
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.