Literature DB >> 8065335

c-Fos-induced activation of a TATA-box-containing promoter involves direct contact with TATA-box-binding protein.

R Metz1, A J Bannister, J A Sutherland, C Hagemeier, E C O'Rourke, A Cook, R Bravo, T Kouzarides.   

Abstract

Transcriptional activation in eukaryotes involves protein-protein interactions between regulatory transcription factors and components of the basal transcription machinery. Here we show that c-Fos, but not a related protein, Fra-1, can bind the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP) both in vitro and in vivo and that c-Fos can also interact with the transcription factor IID complex. High-affinity binding to TBP requires c-Fos activation modules which cooperate to activate transcription. One of these activation modules contains a TBP-binding motif (TBM) which was identified through its homology to TBP-binding viral activators. This motif is required for transcriptional activation, as well as TBP binding. Domain swap experiments indicate that a domain containing the TBM can confer TBP binding on Fra-1 both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo activation experiments indicate that a GAL4-Fos fusion can activate a promoter bearing a GAL4 site linked to a TATA box but that this activity does not occur at high concentrations of GAL4-Fos. This inhibition (squelching) of c-Fos activity is relieved by the presence of excess TBP, indicating that TBP is a direct functional target of c-Fos. Removing the TBM from c-Fos severely abrogates activation of a promoter containing a TATA box but does not affect activation of a promoter driven only by an initiator element. Collectively, these results suggest that c-Fos is able to activate via two distinct mechanisms, only one of which requires contact with TBP. Since TBP binding is not exhibited by Fra-1, TBP-mediated activation may be one characteristic that discriminates the function of Fos-related proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8065335      PMCID: PMC359128          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.14.9.6021-6029.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  50 in total

1.  Control of c-Jun activity by interaction of a cell-specific inhibitor with regulatory domain delta: differences between v- and c-Jun.

Authors:  V R Baichwal; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Reduced binding of TFIID to transcriptionally compromised mutants of VP16.

Authors:  C J Ingles; M Shales; W D Cress; S J Triezenberg; J Greenblatt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ha-Ras augments c-Jun activity and stimulates phosphorylation of its activation domain.

Authors:  B Binétruy; T Smeal; M Karin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Biochemical analysis of transcriptional activation by Jun: differential activity of c- and v-Jun.

Authors:  D Bohmann; R Tjian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Behind the Fos and Jun leucine zipper.

Authors:  T Kouzarides; E Ziff
Journal:  Cancer Cells       Date:  1989-11

6.  Transcriptional regulation by Fos and Jun in vitro: interaction among multiple activator and regulatory domains.

Authors:  C Abate; D Luk; T Curran
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A naturally occurring truncated form of FosB that inhibits Fos/Jun transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Y Nakabeppu; D Nathans
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Functional interaction of the v-Rel and c-Rel oncoproteins with the TATA-binding protein and association with transcription factor IIB.

Authors:  X Xu; C Prorock; H Ishikawa; E Maldonado; Y Ito; C Gélinas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Leucine repeats and an adjacent DNA binding domain mediate the formation of functional cFos-cJun heterodimers.

Authors:  R Turner; R Tjian
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  c-JUN, JUN B, and JUN D differ in their binding affinities to AP-1 and CRE consensus sequences: effect of FOS proteins.

Authors:  R P Ryseck; R Bravo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  31 in total

1.  The activation domain of herpesvirus saimiri R protein interacts with the TATA-binding protein.

Authors:  K T Hall; A J Stevenson; D J Goodwin; P C Gibson; A F Markham; A Whitehouse
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Down-regulation of c-Fos/c-Jun AP-1 dimer activity by sumoylation.

Authors:  Guillaume Bossis; Cécile E Malnou; Rosa Farras; Elisabetta Andermarcher; Robert Hipskind; Manuel Rodriguez; Darja Schmidt; Stefan Muller; Isabelle Jariel-Encontre; Marc Piechaczyk
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The transcription activation domains of Fos and Jun induce DNA bending through electrostatic interactions.

Authors:  T K Kerppola; T Curran
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box.

Authors:  D Yean; J Gralla
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  CCAAT binding NF-Y-TBP interactions: NF-YB and NF-YC require short domains adjacent to their histone fold motifs for association with TBP basic residues.

Authors:  M Bellorini; D K Lee; J C Dantonel; K Zemzoumi; R G Roeder; L Tora; R Mantovani
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The C-terminal domain of c-fos is required for activation of an AP-1 site specific for jun-fos heterodimers.

Authors:  K McBride; M Nemer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Identification of seven hydrophobic clusters in GCN4 making redundant contributions to transcriptional activation.

Authors:  B M Jackson; C M Drysdale; K Natarajan; A G Hinnebusch
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  The human cut homeodomain protein can repress gene expression by two distinct mechanisms: active repression and competition for binding site occupancy.

Authors:  F Mailly; G Bérubé; R Harada; P L Mao; S Phillips; A Nepveu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 9.  The importance of being flexible: the case of basic region leucine zipper transcriptional regulators.

Authors:  Maria Miller
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  Influence of promoter potency on the transcriptional effects of YY1, SRF and Msx-1 in transient transfection analysis.

Authors:  T Lee; M E Bradley; J L Walowitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.