Literature DB >> 8062857

Head posture and cervicovertebral anatomy as mandibular growth predictors.

J A Huggare1, M S Cooke.   

Abstract

In this study, the separate and the combined influence of head posture and cervicovertebral anatomy on mandibular growth direction was analysed. The subjects, 20 boys and 16 girls, were a subsample of 12-year-old Chinese children in Hong Kong, all with initial and 2-5-year follow-up lateral cephalometric radiographs recorded in natural head position (NHP). Postural variables were measured in terms of craniovertical, craniocervical, and cervicohorizontal angulations. Morphological variables of the craniocervical junction region were measured in terms of intervertebral space and atlantoaxial dimensions. Mandibular growth was estimated as the direction of displacement of prognathion in relation to the sella nasion line when superimposing on stable cranial base structures. The data were analysed with a multiple regression model, separately for boys and girls. In both sexes the height of the atlas dorsal arch showed a statistically significant correlation (P < 0.01) with mandibular growth direction (boys r = 0.54 and girls r = 0.62), while the craniovertical angulation correlated significantly only for the boys (NSL/VER r = 0.59, P < 0.01; C1/VER r = 0.49, P < 0.05). However, atlas dorsal arch height (DORS C1) combined with cervicohorizontal angulation (OPT/HOR) in girls and with craniovertical angulation (NSL/VER; C1/VER) in boys, displayed a significantly (P < 0.05) increased correlation (r = 0.76 and 0.71, respectively). Combination of atlas morphology and head posture predicts mandibular growth direction better than either variable alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8062857     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/16.3.175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  7 in total

1.  Sagittal back contour and craniofacial morphology in preadolescents.

Authors:  Carsten Lippold; Emil Segatto; András Végh; Burkhard Drerup; Tatjana Moiseenko; Gholamreza Danesh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal jaw position in relation to body posture in adult humans--a rasterstereographic study.

Authors:  Carsten Lippold; Gholamreza Danesh; Markus Schilgen; Burkhard Drerup; Lars Hackenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae morphology and correlation of cervical vertebrae morphometry, cervical spine inclination and cranial base angle to craniofacial morphology and stature in an adult skeletal class I and class II population.

Authors:  Supriya Nambiar; Subraya Mogra; B Unnikrishnan Nair; Anand Menon; C Suresh Babu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

4.  The distribution of cervical vertebrae anomalies among dental malocclusions.

Authors:  Hasan Kamak; Eren Yildırım
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

5.  Evaluation of natural head position over five minutes: A comparison between an instantaneous and a five-minute analysis with an inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Mustafa Al-Yassary; Kelly Billiaert; Gregory S Antonarakis; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Cervical vertebrae anomalies in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion.

Authors:  Shahin Emami Meibodi; Hadi Parhiz; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Asal Fetrati; Elham Morshedi Meibodi; Arash Meshkat
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2011-07

7.  The relationship between cervical column curvature and sagittal position of the jaws: using a new method for evaluating curvature.

Authors:  Tahereh Hosseinzadeh Nik; Pejman Janbaz Aciyabar
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 0.212

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.