Literature DB >> 8062600

Community screening for diabetes. Low detection rate in a low-risk population.

W P Newman1, R Nelson, K Scheer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate glucose-based community screening for diabetes with regard to detection rate. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a community-screening questionnaire data base that included a screening for blood glucose. Referred subjects had fasting glucose levels > 6.4 mM (115 mg/dl) or postprandial levels > or = 8.9 mM (160 mg/dl). An attempt was made to contact referred subjects and to ascertain whether follow-up was undertaken and current status. A random sample of subjects not meeting the glucose criteria (nonreferred) also was contacted in an analogous fashion to referred subjects.
RESULTS: In 2,016 questionnaires, glucose-based referral criteria were exhibited by 148 (7.3%) individuals, and subsequent evaluation data were available for 111. Of those 111 individuals, 37 (33%) knew they had diabetes before the screening, and 39 (36%) did not seek further evaluation. Of the remaining 35 subjects, 6 (13%) were told of their new diagnosis of diabetes, and 29 were told they did not have diabetes. Three of 50 nonreferred subjects knew of their diabetes before screening. Thirty percent (14 out of 47) of nonreferred subjects underwent subsequent evaluation, although they were not told to do so. A single new case of diabetes occurred in the nonreferred group.
CONCLUSIONS: Community screening for diabetes that is based on measured glucose is of low yield. The known problems of glucose-based screening, coupled with its low yield, make a glucose-based approach difficult to justify. These results indicate that glucose-based community screening should be done only under the careful supervision of a health professional who is trained both in glucose measurement instrumentation and in screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8062600     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.17.5.363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  5 in total

1.  Observations and recommendations for community-based diabetes screenings.

Authors:  Brian West; Punam Parikh; Guedy Arniella; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 2.140

2.  Screening for diabetes in an African-American community: the Project DIRECT experience.

Authors:  Deborah S Porterfield; Rebecca Din; Angela Burroughs; Barri Burrus; Regina Petteway; Linda Treiber; Betty Lamb; Michael Engelgau
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Impact and cost of a 2-week community-based screening and awareness program for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in a Swiss canton.

Authors:  Pascal Bovet; Philippe Hirsiger; Frédéric Emery; Jessica De Bernardini; Christophe Rossier; Josefine Trebeljahr; Isabelle Hagon-Traub
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.168

4.  Initial impact and cost of a nationwide population screening campaign for diabetes in Brazil: a follow up study.

Authors:  Cristiana M Toscano; Bruce B Duncan; Sotero S Mengue; Carísi Anne Polanczyk; Luciana B Nucci; Adriana Costa e Forti; Cláudio D Fonseca; Maria Inês Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Automatic laboratory-based strategy to improve the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in primary care.

Authors:  Maria Salinas; Maite López-Garrigós; Emilio Flores; Maria Leiva-Salinas; Javier Lugo; Francisco J Pomares; Alberto Asencio; Miguel Ahumada; Carlos Leiva-Salinas
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.