Literature DB >> 8062394

Evaluation of national malaria control programmes in Africa.

J Bryce1, J B Roungou, P Nguyen-Dinh, J F Naimoli, J G Breman.   

Abstract

Evaluation is an essential management tool for the improvement of public health programmes or projects. As malaria morbidity and mortality continue to increase in most countries in Africa, international agencies and malaria control programme managers have identified the strengthening of programme evaluation as an important strategy for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of malaria control programmes. Managers can develop an evaluation strategy only after they have defined programme objectives and planned specific programme activities. Indicators should be directly related to programme objectives and should be selected on the basis of the following criteria: their validity; reliability; ability to detect change within a reasonable time period and as a result of successful programme implementation; ability to be interpreted; and usefulness in guiding programme change. Only those indicators that can be measured with available programme resources should be selected. Managers will also need to identify the sources of indicator data and to determine how often each indicator will be measured. Programme managers should develop criteria or indicators for the following: programme policies and plans; the process of programme implementation; the outcomes of malaria control interventions in disease management and prevention; and programme impact in terms of reductions in malaria-related mortality and morbidity. Key issues related to the management of evaluation activities within a national programme include the need to begin with available resources and build incrementally; to explore options for administering evaluation activities; to select, train and supervise staff who carry out evaluation activities; to develop quality control strategies; and to ensure that data are managed and communicated in ways that support effective programme decision-making. For evaluation to lead to improvements in malaria control programmes it must be clearly defined as a part of the programme management process. Programme managers should lead this developmental process, ensuring that evaluation methods produce the information they need to monitor and improve their programmes at reasonable cost.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Africa; Developing Countries; Diseases; Evaluation Indexes; Malaria--prevention and control; Parasitic Diseases; Program Evaluation; Programs; Quantitative Evaluation; Recommendations

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8062394      PMCID: PMC2486696     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  2 in total

1.  Combating severe malaria in African children.

Authors:  J G Breman; C C Campbell
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Hospital-based surveillance of malaria-related paediatric morbidity and mortality in Kinshasa, Zaire.

Authors:  A E Greenberg; M Ntumbanzondo; N Ntula; L Mawa; J Howell; F Davachi
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 9.408

  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  Improved malaria case management through the implementation of a health facility-based sentinel site surveillance system in Uganda.

Authors:  Asadu Sserwanga; Jamal C Harris; Ruth Kigozi; Manoj Menon; Hasifa Bukirwa; Anne Gasasira; Stella Kakeeto; Fred Kizito; Ebony Quinto; Denis Rubahika; Sussann Nasr; Scott Filler; Moses R Kamya; Grant Dorsey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Framework for Selecting Best Practices in Public Health: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Eileen Ng; Pierpaolo de Colombani
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2015-11-17

3.  Competing interests, clashing ideas and institutionalizing influence: insights into the political economy of malaria control from seven African countries.

Authors:  Justin Parkhurst; Ludovica Ghilardi; Jayne Webster; Robert W Snow; Caroline A Lynch
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.344

Review 4.  Measuring coverage in MNCH: challenges and opportunities in the selection of coverage indicators for global monitoring.

Authors:  Jennifer Harris Requejo; Holly Newby; Jennifer Bryce
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 11.069

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.