Literature DB >> 8061010

Matching the heart donor and heart transplant recipient. Clues for successful expansion of the donor pool: a multivariable, multiinstitutional report. The Cardiac Transplant Research Database Group.

J B Young1, D C Naftel, R C Bourge, J K Kirklin, B S Clemson, C B Porter, R J Rodeheffer, J L Kenzora.   

Abstract

Little information is available regarding donor-specific parameters that predict success or failure after heart transplantation. Furthermore, with increasing numbers of patients awaiting heart transplantation, there is tremendous pressure to expand the donor pool by stretching the margins of donor acceptability. To gain insight into donor-related and donor-recipient interrelated predictors of death after transplantation, 1719 consecutive primary transplantations performed at 27 institutions between Jan. 1, 1990, and June 30, 1992, were analyzed. Mean follow-up of survivors was 13.9 months, and actuarial survival was 85% at 1 year. By multivariable analysis, risk factors for death included younger recipient age (p = 0.006), older recipient age (p = 0.0005), ventilator support at time of transplantation (p = 0.0006), higher pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.02), older donor age (p < 0.0001), smaller donor body surface area (female donor heart placed into larger male patient) (p = 0.003), greater donor inotropic support (p = 0.01), donor diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01), longer ischemic time (p = 0.0003), diffuse donor heart wall motion abnormalities by echocardiography (p = 0.06), and, for pediatric donors, death from causes other than closed head trauma (p = 0.02). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7% but increased to 11% when donor age exceeded 50 years and was 12% when inotropic support exceeded 20 micrograms/kg/min dopamine plus dobutamine and 22% with diffuse echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities. The interaction of donor risk factors was such that the heart of a smaller female donor given high-dose inotropes placed into a larger male recipient produced a predicted 30-day mortality rate of 26% and the heart of a 25-year-old male donor given high-dose inotropes with diffuse echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities transplanted into a 50-year-old male recipient led to a predicted 30-day mortality rate of 17%. This analysis supports cautious extension of criteria for donor acceptance but with an anticipated greater risk in the presence of diffuse echocardiographic wall motion abnormalities and long anticipated ischemic time, particularly in older donors given inotropic support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8061010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  18 in total

1.  Early graft failure after heart transplant: risk factors and implications for improved donor-recipient matching.

Authors:  Cristiano Amarelli; Luca Salvatore De Santo; Claudio Marra; Ciro Maiello; Ciro Bancone; Alessandro Della Corte; Gianantonio Nappi; Gianpaolo Romano
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-04-04

Review 2.  How to increase the utilization of donor hearts?

Authors:  Maya Guglin
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Mortality, rehospitalization, and post-transplant complications in gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Association of graft ischemic time with survival after heart transplant among children in the United States.

Authors:  Mackenzie A Ford; Christopher S Almond; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Gary Piercey; Elizabeth D Blume; Leslie B Smoot; Francis Fynn-Thompson; Tajinder P Singh
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Who gets a heart? Rationing and rationalizing in heart transplantation.

Authors:  M D Allen; D P Fishbein; M McBride; M Ellison; O P Daily
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-05

6.  First-year clinical outcomes in gender-mismatched heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Donor and recipient age matching in heart transplantation: analysis of the UNOS Registry.

Authors:  Oliver K Jawitz; Vignesh Raman; Jacob Klapper; Matthew Hartwig; Chetan B Patel; Carmelo Milano
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 8.  Heart transplantation research in the next decade--a goal to achieving evidence-based outcomes: National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute Working Group.

Authors:  Monica R Shah; Randall C Starling; Lisa Schwartz Longacre; Mandeep R Mehra
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Predictors of rehospitalization time during the first year after heart transplant.

Authors:  Anne Jalowiec; Kathleen L Grady; Connie White-Williams
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.210

10.  Donor predictors of allograft use and recipient outcomes after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Kiran K Khush; Rebecca Menza; John Nguyen; Jonathan G Zaroff; Benjamin A Goldstein
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 8.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.