Literature DB >> 8060605

Molecular genetic predictive testing for Alzheimer's disease: deliberations and preliminary recommendations.

A Lennox1, H Karlinsky, W Meschino, J A Buchanan, M E Percy, J M Berg.   

Abstract

Forty-one participants representing diverse professional back-grounds attended a workshop on genetic predictive testing for familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) on January 23, 1993 at Surrey Place Centre in Toronto, Canada. Rapidly emerging molecular genetic findings in AD indicate that predictive testing is now technologically feasible for selected individuals, although defining eligibility criteria remains problematic. Legal, ethical, biomedical, and psychosocial issues related to establishing predictive testing programs for AD were discussed at the workshop. This article reflects these discussions, provides the current biomedical background for them and examines the Huntington's disease (HD) predictive testing experience. Observations concerning molecular genetic predictive testing for AD in light of its genetic heterogeneity and clinical characteristics, such as usual later age of onset than HD, are presented. It is proposed that predictive testing for AD can now be cautiously offered in a research setting primarily according to the recommendations contained within the Ethical Issues Policy Statement on Huntington's Disease Molecular Genetics Predictive Test. However, in their application to AD, some points in the statement are considered to require emphasis, modification, or currently to be of uncertain applicability. This represents an initial step in an on-going process of debate concerning AD that will be required as new advances occur in genetic and clinical research and in bioethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8060605     DOI: 10.1097/00002093-199408020-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord        ISSN: 0893-0341            Impact factor:   2.703


  7 in total

1.  Differences between African American and White research volunteers in their attitudes, beliefs and knowledge regarding genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ibidapo Akinleye; J Scott Roberts; Charmaine D M Royal; Erin Linnenbringer; Thomas O Obisesan; Grace-Ann Fasaye; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Clinical rationale of genetic testing in dementia.

Authors:  G B Frisoni; M Trabucchi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Preparing for presymptomatic DNA testing for early onset Alzheimer's disease/cerebral haemorrhage and hereditary Pick disease.

Authors:  A Tibben; M Stevens; G M de Wert; M F Niermeijer; C M van Duijn; J C van Swieten
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Presymptomatic Genetic Testing with an APP Mutation in Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease: A Descriptive Study of Sibship Dynamics.

Authors:  K A Quaid; J R Murrell; A M Hake; M R Farlow; B Ghetti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Comparing test-specific distress of susceptibility versus deterministic genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; J Scott Roberts; Thomas D Bird; Ellen J Steinbart; L Adrienne Cupples; Clara A Chen; Erin Linnenbringer; Robert C Green
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  A survey of attitudes toward clinical trials and genetic disclosure in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Joshua D Grill; Randall J Bateman; Virginia Buckles; Angela Oliver; John C Morris; Colin L Masters; William E Klunk; John M Ringman
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 6.982

Review 7.  Predictive Genetic Counseling for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Jill S Goldman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 5.159

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.