Literature DB >> 8059910

Direct amplification and differentiation of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica DNA from stool specimens.

S Katzwinkel-Wladarsch1, T Loscher, H Rinder.   

Abstract

Discrimination of pathogenic and nonpathogenic Entamoeba histolytica is of great clinical importance. A simple and rapid DNA extraction method that can be used directly with stool specimens was developed without the need for prior cultivation of the parasites. The entire protocol can be performed at room temperature in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube format. There is no DNA precipitation step. The subsequent nested polymerase chain reaction consists of an initial E. histolytica-specific amplification, followed by two separate amplifications using two primer pairs specific for pathogenic and nonpathogenic E. histolytica, respectively. Amplification products can be verified by restriction endonuclease digests. There is no need for hybridizations or the use of radionucleotides. One trophozoite per milligram of stool sample could be detected and differentiated in a 0.1-g specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8059910     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1994.51.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  23 in total

1.  DNA typing from human faeces.

Authors:  A J Hopwood; A Mannucci; K M Sullivan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Comparison of PCR, isoenzyme analysis, and antigen detection for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica infection.

Authors:  R Haque; I K Ali; S Akther; W A Petri
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Simple differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar in fresh stool specimens by sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin concentration and PCR.

Authors:  H Troll; H Marti; N Weiss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of real-time PCR protocols for differential laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis.

Authors:  Yvonne Qvarnstrom; Cleve James; Maniphet Xayavong; Brian P Holloway; Govinda S Visvesvara; Rama Sriram; Alexandre J da Silva
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Molecular methods for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica in a clinical setting: an overview.

Authors:  Jaishree Paul; Shweta Srivastava; Sudha Bhattacharya
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 2.011

6.  Specific detection by PCR of Streptococcus agalactiae in milk.

Authors:  G Martinez; J Harel; M Gottschalk
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of amebiasis.

Authors:  Mehmet Tanyuksel; William A Petri
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Molecular epidemiology of amebiasis.

Authors:  Ibne Karim M Ali; C Graham Clark; William A Petri
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.342

9.  Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in the definitive host: coprodiagnosis by PCR as an alternative to necropsy.

Authors:  A Dinkel; M von Nickisch-Rosenegk; B Bilger; M Merli; R Lucius; T Romig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Entamoeba moshkovskii infections in children, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Ibne Karim M Ali; Mohammad Bakhtiar Hossain; Shantanu Roy; Patrick F Ayeh-Kumi; William A Petri; Rashidul Haque; C Graham Clark
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.