Literature DB >> 8059486

Destruction of gallstones and model stones by extracorporeal shock waves.

M Delius1, F Ueberle, S Gambihler.   

Abstract

The disintegration effectivity of an electrohydraulic lithotripter was evaluated by determining the acoustic energy that had to be applied, until all fragments of three artificial materials and human gallstones were cleared from a basket of 2.8 mm mesh size. The lithotripter had either an open ellipsoid, or the ellipsoidal axis was covered with a metal cage as used in clinical lithotripters to house the ultrasound scanner. Fragmentation was assessed at a low, medium and high voltage setting using 9 and 16 mm breeze block marbles, considered to be primarily fragmented by a cavitation-mediated mechanism; 16 mm glass marbles, considered to be primarily fragmented by a direct shock wave effect; 12 and 15 mm plaster balls as commonly used to monitor lithotripter output; and gallstones with a mean diameter of 16 mm. As a result, the acoustic energy for the disintegration of 9 and 16 mm breeze block marbles was 620 and 670 mJ cm-3, of glass marbles 3369 mJ cm-3, of 12 and 15 mm plaster balls 1599 and 1764 mJ cm-3 and of gallstones 8050 mJ cm-3. It was largely independent of pulse energy, specimen size and configuration of the shock wave source. It is concluded that acoustic energy is a major determinant of disintegration, independent of the presumed mechanism of destruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8059486     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)90065-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  8 in total

1.  DNA damage induced by lithotripter generated shock waves: short report.

Authors:  A M Kochański; J P Mejnartowicz; A Latos-Bieleńska; J Etienne; L Filipczyńiski
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Effect of lithotripter focal width on stone comminution in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jun Qin; W Neal Simmons; Georgy Sankin; Pei Zhong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Improving the lens design and performance of a contemporary electromagnetic shock wave lithotripter.

Authors:  Andreas Neisius; Nathan B Smith; Georgy Sankin; Nicholas John Kuntz; John Francis Madden; Daniel E Fovargue; Sorin Mitran; Michael Eric Lipkin; Walter Neal Simmons; Glenn M Preminger; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Stone comminution correlates with the average peak pressure incident on a stone during shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  N Smith; P Zhong
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effects of Stone Size on the Comminution Process and Efficiency in Shock Wave Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Isaac Nault; Sorin Mitran; Edwin S Iversen; Pei Zhong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Distinct sensitivity of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  F Lejbkowicz; S Salzberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Historical ESWT Paradigms Are Overcome: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Heinz Lohrer; Tanja Nauck; Vasileios Korakakis; Nikos Malliaropoulos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Shock wave-induced ATP release from osteosarcoma U2OS cells promotes cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of methotrexate.

Authors:  Baochang Qi; Tiecheng Yu; Chengxue Wang; Tiejun Wang; Jihang Yao; Xiaomeng Zhang; Pengfei Deng; Yongning Xia; Wolfgang G Junger; Dahui Sun
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.