Literature DB >> 8058730

Immunotherapy with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies and recombinant interleukin 2: stimulation of molecular programs of cytotoxic killer cells and induction of tumor regression.

F Nakajima1, A Khanna, G Xu, M Lagman, R Haschemeyer, J Mouradian, J C Wang, K H Stenzel, A L Rubin, M Suthanthiran.   

Abstract

Adoptive cellular immunotherapy, infusions of interleukin 2 (IL-2) in conjunction with in vitro-activated killer cells, has brought new hope to patients with cancer. The broad application of this strategy, however, is constrained by the need for repeated leukapheresis and by the labor-intensive process of in vitro activation of cells. Also, current protocols generally use nonphysiological and toxic concentrations of IL-2. Identification of an in vivo stimulant that renders T cells responsive to physiologic concentrations of IL-2 represents a potential improvement over existing approaches. We have determined whether in vivo administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed at the T-cell surface protein CD3 induces T-cell responsiveness to IL-2, stimulates cytolytic molecular programs of natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells, and induces tumor regression. These hypotheses were explored in a murine hepatic MCA-102 fibrosarcoma model. We report that in vivo administration of anti-CD3 mAbs plus IL-2 results in intrahepatic expression of mRNA-encoding perforin, cytotoxic T-cell-specific serine esterase, and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Anti-CD3 mAbs alone or IL-2 alone failed to induce or induced minimal expression of these molecular mediators of cytotoxicity. The anti-CD3 mAbs plus IL-2 regimen also resulted in a significantly smaller number of hepatic metastases and a significantly longer survival time of tumor-bearing mice, compared to treatment with anti-CD3 mAbs alone or IL-2 alone. Our findings suggest that a regimen of anti-CD3 mAbs plus IL-2 is a more effective antitumor regimen compared with anti-CD3 mAbs alone or IL-2 alone and advance an alternative immunotherapy strategy of potential value for the treatment of cancer in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8058730      PMCID: PMC44509          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.17.7889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  33 in total

Review 1.  Cancer immunotherapy: are the results discouraging? Can they be improved?

Authors:  E Kedar; E Klein
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.242

Review 2.  The pathophysiology of tumor necrosis factors.

Authors:  P Vassalli
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 28.527

3.  The strong correlation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-specific serine protease gene transcripts with renal allograft rejection.

Authors:  M L Lipman; A C Stevens; R C Bleackley; J H Helderman; T R McCune; W E Harmon; M E Shapiro; S Rosen; T B Strom
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  A central role of perforin in cytolysis?

Authors:  E R Podack; H Hengartner; M G Lichtenheld
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 5.  T-cell growth factors and the treatment of patients with cancer.

Authors:  M T Lotze
Journal:  Clin Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1992-01

6.  Unmodified pancreatic islet allograft rejection results in the preferential expression of certain T cell activation transcripts.

Authors:  P J O'Connell; A Pacheco-Silva; P W Nickerson; R A Muggia; M Bastos; V R Kelley; T B Strom
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Costimulation of antitumor immunity by the B7 counterreceptor for the T lymphocyte molecules CD28 and CTLA-4.

Authors:  L Chen; S Ashe; W A Brady; I Hellström; K E Hellström; J A Ledbetter; P McGowan; P S Linsley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-12-24       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody treatment of patients with CD3-negative tumors: a phase IA/B study.

Authors:  W J Urba; C Ewel; W Kopp; J W Smith; R G Steis; J D Ashwell; S P Creekmore; J Rossio; M Sznol; W Sharfman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-05-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Specific adoptive immunotherapy mediated by tumor-draining lymph node cells sequentially activated with anti-CD3 and IL-2.

Authors:  H Yoshizawa; A E Chang; S Shu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-07-15       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Interleukin 7 generates antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes against murine sarcomas with efficacy in cellular adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  D L Jicha; J J Mulé; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Specific immunotherapy of cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  S Matzku; M Zöller
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  CD8 T cell activation after intravenous administration of CD3 x CD19 bispecific antibody in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  G C de Gast; I A Haagen; A A van Houten; S C Klein; A J Duits; R A de Weger; T M Vroom; M R Clark; J Phillips; A J van Dijk
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.968

3.  Induction of anti-tumour lymphocytes in cancer patients after brief exposure to supernatants from cultures of anti-CD3-stimulated allogeneic lymphocytes.

Authors:  C N Baxevanis; M L Tsiatas; N T Cacoullos; G Spanakos; C Liacos; I Missitzis; S I Papadhimitriou; M Papamichail
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.