Literature DB >> 8057798

Diffusion and relaxation mapping of cartilage-bone plugs and excised disks using microscopic magnetic resonance imaging.

Y Xia1, T Farquhar, N Burton-Wurster, E Ray, L W Jelinski.   

Abstract

Spatially resolved maps of proton self-diffusion coefficients (D) and relaxation times (T1 and T2) were obtained on cartilage-bone plug samples and on excised disks of canine cartilage at a transverse resolution of 30 microns, using microscopic magnetic resonance imaging (micro-MRI). Results are compared for excised disks of cartilage and intact cartilage-bone plugs. Correlations between the absolute water concentration, the self-diffusion coefficient and the T1 relaxation are reported. The diffusion coefficient is not a linear function of water concentration. The thickness of the disks is 600 microns, compared with the ca. 900 microns observed for the cartilage-bone plugs, presumably due to the absence of the interfacial or tidemark layer of interdigitated cartilage and bone in the former samples. Our results suggest that excised disks of cartilage are excellent models for the articular surface and the first 500 or so microns of tissue. The molecular parameters of spin-spin and spin-lattice relaxation times, as well as the water self-diffusion coefficient, are virtually identical in the two types of samples. However, the cartilage-bone plugs have the additional feature of permitting the study of the tidemark region, a region that likely plays a major role in the transmission of mechanical force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8057798     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910310306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  26 in total

1.  Permeation of dimethyl sulfoxide into articular cartilage at subzero temperatures.

Authors:  Shao-Zhi Zhang; Xiao-Yi Yu; Guang-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  UTE-T2∗ mapping of human articular cartilage in vivo: a repeatability assessment.

Authors:  A Williams; Y Qian; C R Chu
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 3.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  In vivo T(1rho) mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS).

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Eric T Han; Reed F Busse; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 5.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

6.  [Degenerative and age-related alterations of the spine].

Authors:  W Reith; S Bodea; M Kettner; R Mühl-Benninghausen; A Simgen
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  DQF-MT MRI of connective tissues: application to tendon and muscle.

Authors:  Slawomir Kusmia; Uzi Eliav; Gil Navon; Geneviève Guillot
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Pulsed gradient stimulated echo (PGStE) NMR shows spatial dependence of fluid diffusion in human stage IV osteoarthritic cartilage.

Authors:  Sarah E Mailhiot; Sarah L Codd; Jennifer R Brown; Joseph D Seymour; Ronald K June
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  [MRI in the follow-up of matrix-supported autologous chondrocyte transplantation (MACI) and microfracture].

Authors:  G Bachmann; E Basad; D Lommel; J Steinmeyer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.