Literature DB >> 8056020

Management of ureteric stones.

M Marberger1, J Hofbauer, C Türk, K Höbarth, W Albrecht.   

Abstract

Based on experience with over 2,000 patients, the treatment of ureteric stones today relies on extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in situ and ureteroscopy with semirigid, ultrathin ureteroscopes combined with pneumatic or laser lithotripsy. All stones in the upper and larger stones in the distal third of the ureter are preferably treated by ESWL in situ, whereas smaller stones in the distal ureter are better treated by endoscopy. Midureteric stones continue to be the domain of primary ureteroscopy; in cases of moderate obstruction in asymptomatic patients, it may also be acceptable to wait for the stone to pass into the distal ureter spontaneously to be treated by ESWL in situ there. Manipulation of the stone back into the kidney and treating it by ESWL there (push back/ESWL) offers no advantage over ESWL in situ, as results are not better yet morbidity is higher. 'Blind' instrumentation has lost all justification, and incisional ureteric lithotomy is no longer indicated but in exceptional cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8056020     DOI: 10.1159/000475300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  2 in total

1.  Comparision of intracorporeal lithotripsy methods and forceps use for distal ureteral stones: seven years experience.

Authors:  C O Yeniyol; A R Ayder; S Minareci; S Ciçek; T Süelözgen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.