Literature DB >> 8055073

Linking outcomes measurement to continual improvement: the serial "V" way of thinking about improving clinical care.

P B Batalden1, E C Nelson, J S Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcomes measurement, process improvement, and continual improvement all have been used to improve quality in health care. However, the mutually complementary approaches have been used primarily in isolation from each other. The "Serial V" ("Vee") concept attempts to integrate these approaches to provide a fuller assessment and practical approach to quality improvement.
METHODS: Outcomes measurement is used primarily to identify variations in care and possibly to determine corrective actions that may minimize those variations. Process improvement focuses on breaking down the components of a specific process of health care delivery, identifying or reworking problem areas in the process, then rebuilding the process. Continual improvement involves pinpointing a particular area for improvement, proposing specific changes, testing the instituted changes, and evaluating the success of such changes. The Serial V concept is an integrative strategy that incorporates aspects of all three approaches to create a comprehensive way to evaluate, institute, and reflect on change aimed at improvement. While this way of thinking appears complex at first glance, a practical worksheet that details each step in the process can be used to begin the clinical improvement work. Use of the Serial V approach, which unites measurement of outcomes, analysis of the clinical process, and repeated pilot tests to improve outcomes in real-world clinical settings, will accelerate improvement in health care outcomes and eliminate unnecessary costs.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8055073     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30059-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  5 in total

1.  The validation and psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QOL).

Authors:  Jan Vanderwegen; Gwen Van Nuffelen; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  A longitudinal study of hospitalization rates for patients with chronic disease: results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  E C Nelson; C A McHorney; W G Manning; W H Rogers; M Zubkoff; S Greenfield; J E Ware; A R Tarlov
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Explicit approach to rounds in an ICU improves communication and satisfaction of providers.

Authors:  Peter M Dodek; Janet Raboud
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  A review of the urban development and transport impacts on public health with particular reference to Australia: trans-disciplinary research teams and some research gaps.

Authors:  Deborah Black; John Black
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Learning Evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations.

Authors:  Bijal A Balasubramanian; Deborah J Cohen; Melinda M Davis; Rose Gunn; L Miriam Dickinson; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.