Literature DB >> 8054773

The macroscopic diagnosis of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer.

T Sano1, O Kobori, H Nagawa, T Muto.   

Abstract

As the proportion of early gastric cancers (EGC) has been steadily increasing, modifications of the "radical lymphadenectomy" approach to stomach cancer have been attracting considerable attention; however, accurate pre- and intraoperative evaluations of tumor extent are essential for the successful application of this method. We examined the reliability of macroscopically diagnosing node involvement by reviewing the operative and pathological records of 522 patients with EGC. Of 59 patients histologically diagnosed as node-positive (n+), only 19 (32%) had been macroscopically diagnosed as node-positive (N+). In contrast, of 61 N+ patients, 42 (69%) were in fact n-. Metastases from histologically diffuse type carcinomas were less accurately diagnosed than those from intestinal type tumors. In 44% of the false-positive (N+/n-) patients, the tumor had been preoperatively diagnosed as advanced, which seemed to have lead to intraoperative overdiagnosis. These results suggest that lymph node metastases from EGC cannot be reliably diagnosed during surgery. The indications for a modified radical operation should thus be decided according to preoperative tumor evaluation based on the depth of invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8054773     DOI: 10.1007/bf01676882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  7 in total

1.  Early gastric cancer. Endoscopic diagnosis of depth of invasion.

Authors:  T Sano; Y Okuyama; O Kobori; T Shimizu; Y Morioka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Lymphadenectomy for cure in patients with early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  T Okamura; S Tsujitani; D Korenaga; M Haraguchi; H Baba; Y Hiramoto; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The general rules for the gastric cancer study in surgery and pathology. Part I. Clinical classification.

Authors:  T Kajitani
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1981-03

4.  Surgical treatment of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Kitaoka; K Yoshikawa; T Hirota; M Itabashi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Analysis of early gastric cancer cases collected from major hospitals and institutes in Japan.

Authors:  H Fukutomi; T Sakita
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Complete ten-year postgastrectomy follow-up of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  H Itoh; Y Oohata; K Nakamura; T Nagata; R Mibu; F Nakayama
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: endoscopic resection of tumour.

Authors:  T Sano; O Kobori; T Muto
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  The expression of cadherin-catenin complex in association with the clinicopathologic features of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  C Xiangming; S Hokita; K Nuruki; H Toyoyama; G Tanabe; M Baba; S Takao; T Aikou
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Preoperative accuracy of gastric cancer staging in patient selection for preoperative therapy: race may affect accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  Naruhiko Ikoma; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; William A Ross; Brian Weston; Yi-Ju Chiang; Mariela A Blum; Tara Sagebiel; Catherine E Devine; Aurelio Matamoros; Keith Fournier; Paul Mansfield; Jaffer A Ajani; Brian D Badgwell
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-12

3.  Rationale for extensive lymphadenectomy in early gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K Miwa; I Miyazaki; H Sahara; T Fujimura; Y Yonemura; M Noguchi; R Falla
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.