Literature DB >> 8053585

Propofol causes a dose-dependent decrease in the thermoregulatory threshold for vasoconstriction but has little effect on sweating.

K Leslie1, D I Sessler, A R Bjorksten, M Ozaki, T Matsukawa, M Schroeder, S Lin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volatile anesthetics increase the core temperature required to trigger sweating and decrease the core temperature required to trigger vasoconstriction. However, little is known about the effects of intravenous anesthetics on thermoregulation. We therefore tested the hypothesis that propofol increases the sweating threshold and decreases the vasoconstriction threshold, thereby increasing the inter-threshold range (core temperatures not triggering autonomic thermoregulatory responses). The study was conducted using a new model in which thermal manipulations were restricted to insensate skin, and sensate skin temperature was controlled.
METHODS: Six healthy, male volunteers were studied on 3 randomly ordered days: no propofol, target propofol blood concentration 2 micrograms/ml, and target blood propofol concentration 4 micrograms/ml. Each day, epidural anesthesia (approximately T11 level) was induced, using 2% 2-chloroprocaine (one volunteer received bupivacaine). Thermal manipulations were confined to the legs, and we attempted to maintain upper-body (sensate) skin temperature constant. Propofol was infused by a computer-controlled infusion pump. Volunteers were heated until sweating was observed, then cooled until fingertip vasoconstriction was observed. The sweating threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering sustained evaporative heat loss > 40 g.m-2.h-1. Similarly, the vasoconstriction threshold was defined as the tympanic membrane temperature triggering a sustained reduction in fingertip blood flow to < 0.25 ml/min. Central venous blood was assayed for propofol blood concentration.
RESULTS: Increasing propofol concentration produced a linear decrease the vasoconstriction threshold (slope = -0.53 +/- 0.34 degrees C.microgram-1.ml-1; R2 = 0.98 +/- 0.04 [mean +/- SD]), but had little effect on the sweating threshold. The inter-threshold range was 0.51 +/- 0.46 degrees C during epidural anesthesia alone, and increased significantly, by 0.49 +/- 0.31 degrees C.microgram-1.ml-1 during propofol administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Like volatile anesthetics, propofol reduces the vasoconstriction threshold and increases the inter-threshold range. However, propofol differs in leaving the sweating threshold unchanged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8053585     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199408000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel K O'Neill; Bryan Robins; Elizabeth A Ayello; Germaine Cuff; Patrick Linton; Harold Brem
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  A comparison of four infrared tympanic thermometers with tympanic membrane temperatures measured by thermocouples.

Authors:  T Matsukawa; M Ozaki; K Hanagata; H Iwashita; T Miyaji; T Kumazawa
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Physiology and clinical relevance of induced hypothermia.

Authors:  Anthony G Doufas; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Comparison of Core Body Temperatures in Patients Administered Remimazolam or Propofol during Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cheol Lee; Cheolhyeong Lee; Juhwan Lee; Gihyeon Jang; ByoungRyun Kim; SeongNam Park
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 5.  Temperature monitoring and perioperative thermoregulation.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Experience of adverse events with cerebral propofol testing in patients with drug resistant epilepsy.

Authors:  Marta Szantroch; Aleksandra Bala; Andrzej Rysz; Jarosław Żyłkowski; Andrzej Marchel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Forced air warming during sedation in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Aaron Conway; Suzanna Ersotelos; Joanna Sutherland; Jed Duff
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 5.994

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.