Literature DB >> 8053334

Classification of hip fractures.

H De Boeck1.   

Abstract

Several classifications of hip fractures have been proposed in the literature. The usefulness of classifications of hip fractures was examined between Belgian Orthopaedic and General Surgeons. Garden's classification of subcapital fractures is the most widely adopted system. Simple anatomic identification is preferred by 64.9 per cent for intertrochanteric fractures and by 78.7 per cent for subtrochanteric fractures. Classifications of fractures for clinical research are considered necessary by 89.4 per cent but there is no universally accepted system. Radiographs of 5 hips were classified by 10 colleagues using the AO Classification system. No fracture was classified identical by all observers. This confirms earlier studies that observers had a poor ability to classify hip fractures according to a given classification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8053334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations.

Authors:  Mohamed Zarie; Mohamed Farah Mohamoud; Amir Reza Farhoud; Nima Bagheri; Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan; Mahdi Heshmatifar; Hadi Klantar
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-09

2.  Reproducibility of the Tronzo and AO classifications for transtrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Mattos; Alexandre Atsushi Koza Jesus; Michelle Dos Santos Floter; Luccas Franco Bettencourt Nunes; Bárbara de Baptista Sanches; José Luís Amim Zabeu
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.