Literature DB >> 8052677

Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation.

R R Balise1, R L Diehl.   

Abstract

Across and within languages voiced sibilants tend to be disfavored relative to voiceless ones. This paper explores the claim that voicing more adversely affects the distinctive acoustic properties of sibilants than those of nonsibilants. One prediction associated with this claim is that voicing differentially lowers the amplitude of frication noise for sibilants and non-sibilants so that amplitude differences between the two classes are reduced. Acoustic measurements confirm this prediction. A second prediction is that voicing has a greater negative effect on the identification of sibilants than nonsibilants. Perceptual results from this and previous studies are somewhat variable, but averaged data support this prediction. The findings suggest that voiced sibilants are disfavored in part for perceptual reasons.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8052677     DOI: 10.1159/000261962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phonetica        ISSN: 0031-8388            Impact factor:   1.759


  2 in total

1.  What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Allard Jongman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Discrimination of Multiple Coronal Stop Contrasts in Wubuy (Australia): A Natural Referent Consonant Account.

Authors:  Rikke L Bundgaard-Nielsen; Brett J Baker; Christian H Kroos; Mark Harvey; Catherine T Best
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.