Literature DB >> 8052648

A critical test of the role of population density in producing transformation.

A Yao1, H Rubin.   

Abstract

Cells of the NIH 3T3 line gain the capacity to produce neoplastically transformed foci when they are maintained at high density for more than 1 week and transferred in a standard assay for focus formation. This change in cell behavior has been variously attributed to an adaptive response to the constraint of the high population density or to a spontaneous genetic change that increases in probability for a culture with the increase in the total number of cell divisions. To distinguish between these alternatives, 200 cells of the 28H subline were seeded in many culture dishes of two size classes differing 6-fold in surface area and allowed to multiply for 1, 2, and 3 weeks. At each weekly interval, 18 dishes of each class were assayed for focus formation, and two of the original dishes were stained for focus formation. The cells in the small (S) and large (L) dishes multiplied to the same extent at 1 week and produced only a few small light foci in some of the assay dishes. At 2 weeks, cells in the S dishes had become confluent and had only one-third the number of cells as those in the nonconfluent L dishes. Upon assay, 14 of the 18 S cultures produced some foci whereas only 9 of the L cultures did so. In addition, 4 of the S cultures produced large dense foci while none of the L cultures did. By 3 weeks, the L cultures were confluent and had four times as many cells as the S cultures. When assayed at this time, both sets produced dense foci in many of the cultures and light foci in the remaining ones, indicating a narrowing of the differences between the S and L cultures between 2 and 3 weeks of incubation. There were differences in the morphology of the foci produced in parallel assays from different cultures. The results showed that transformation is a diverse graded response to the growth constraint of high population density and not a spontaneous event dependent on the number of cell divisions in a cell culture. Transformation thus is basically an epigenetic process since it represents a response to physiological restraint, but the final form of response may be modulated by genetic alterations.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8052648      PMCID: PMC44472          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  22 in total

1.  Chromosomal variation and the establishment of somatic cell lines in vitro.

Authors:  M Terzi; T S Hawkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Transformation of NIH/3T3 mouse cells by DNA of Rous sarcoma virus.

Authors:  N G Copeland; A D Zelenetz; G M Cooper
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Development of 3T3-like lines from Balb-c mouse embryo cultures: transformation susceptibility to SV40.

Authors:  S A Aaronson; G J Todaro
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1968-10       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Quantitative and qualitative studies of chemical transformation of cloned C3H mouse embryo cells sensitive to postconfluence inhibition of cell division.

Authors:  C A Reznikoff; J S Bertram; D W Brankow; C Heidelberger
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Probabilistic view of the transformation of cultured C3H/10T1/2 mouse embryo fibroblasts by 3-methylcholanthrene.

Authors:  A Fernandez; S Mondal; C Heidelberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Relationship between x-ray exposure and malignant transformation in C3H 10T1/2 cells.

Authors:  A R Kennedy; M Fox; G Murphy; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Inhibition of carcinogen-induced chromosomal aberrations by an anticarcinogenic protease inhibitor.

Authors:  A R Kinsella; M Radman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Phorbol ester dramatically increases incidence of methotrexate-resistant mouse cells: possible mechanisms and relevance to tumor promotion.

Authors:  A Varshavsky
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Cell density dependence of focus formation in the C3H/10T1/2 transformation assay.

Authors:  D A Haber; D A Fox; W S Dynan; W G Thilly
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines.

Authors:  G J TODARO; H GREEN
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1963-05       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  5 in total

1.  Coculturing diverse clonal populations prevents the early-stage neoplastic progression that occurs in the separate clones.

Authors:  M Chow; H Rubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Clonal dynamics of progressive neoplastic transformation.

Authors:  M Chow; H Rubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The cellular ecology of progressive neoplastic transformation: a clonal analysis.

Authors:  M Chow; H Rubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Heritable, population-wide damage to cells as the driving force of neoplastic transformation.

Authors:  H Rubin; A Yao; M Chow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cytogenetic monoclonality in multifocal uroepithelial carcinomas: evidence of intraluminal tumour seeding.

Authors:  I Fadl-Elmula; L Gorunova; N Mandahl; P Elfving; R Lundgren; F Mitelman; S Heim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.