Literature DB >> 8052536

Base preferences for DNA binding by the bHLH-Zip protein USF: effects of MgCl2 on specificity and comparison with binding of Myc family members.

A J Bendall1, P L Molloy.   

Abstract

Studies of the DNA binding specificity of transcription factors belonging to the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) family have identified the so-called E-box, CACGTG, as being a high affinity specific binding sequence for this class of DNA binding proteins. Binding sequences for HeLa USF were selected from an initially random population of 20 bp sequences, defining the optimum USF binding sequence as R-5Y-4C-3A-2C-1G+1T+2G+3R+4Y+5. The significance of the flanking bases was further demonstrated by showing that USF and the related proteins c-Myc and Max discriminate between CACGTG-type E-boxes and that the primary means of discrimination appears to be the identity of the nucleotide at +/- 4, the presence of a T at -4 being inhibitory to binding by Myc but not by USF or Max. This suggests one mechanism by which bHLH factors are partitioned between multiple potential binding sequences in the promoters and enhancers of viral and cellular genes. It was also demonstrated that MgCl2 has a significant influence on USF DNA binding specificity. A broader range of USF binding sites was selected in the absence of MgCl2, conforming to the altered half-site consensus gTGaY. Binding studies with specific oligonucleotides demonstrated significantly improved tolerance to sequence variation at positions 1, 4, and to a lesser extent 5, of the GTGRY consensus in the absence of MgCl2. The results indicate that Mg2+ ions have an integral role in the formation of the USF-DNA complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8052536      PMCID: PMC308250          DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.14.2801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  48 in total

1.  A single polypeptide possesses the binding and transcription activities of the adenovirus major late transcription factor.

Authors:  L A Chodosh; R W Carthew; P A Sharp
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The adenovirus major late transcription factor activates the rat gamma-fibrinogen promoter.

Authors:  L A Chodosh; R W Carthew; J G Morgan; G R Crabtree; P A Sharp
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  In vitro transcription from the adenovirus 2 major late promoter utilizing templates truncated at promoter-proximal sites.

Authors:  R Jove; J L Manley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-07-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  An RNA polymerase II transcription factor binds to an upstream element in the adenovirus major late promoter.

Authors:  R W Carthew; L A Chodosh; P A Sharp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Interaction of a gene-specific transcription factor with the adenovirus major late promoter upstream of the TATA box region.

Authors:  M Sawadogo; R G Roeder
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Separation and characterization of factors mediating accurate transcription by RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  M Samuels; A Fire; P A Sharp
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-12-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Stimulation of in vitro transcription by the upstream element of the adenovirus-2 major late promoter involves a specific factor.

Authors:  N G Miyamoto; V Moncollin; M Wintzerith; R Hen; J M Egly; P Chambon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1984-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Purification of a factor specific for the upstream element of the adenovirus-2 major late promoter.

Authors:  V Moncollin; N G Miyamoto; X M Zheng; J M Egly
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Specific interaction between a transcription factor and the upstream element of the adenovirus-2 major late promoter.

Authors:  N G Miyamoto; V Moncollin; J M Egly; P Chambon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Structure and function of the b/HLH/Z domain of USF.

Authors:  A R Ferré-D'Amaré; P Pognonec; R G Roeder; S K Burley
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  44 in total

1.  Coexamination of site-specific transcription factor binding and promoter activity in living cells.

Authors:  K E Boyd; P J Farnham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Specificity of DNA binding of the c-Myc/Max and ARNT/ARNT dimers at the CACGTG recognition site.

Authors:  H I Swanson; J H Yang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Alteration of the levels of the M-type 6-phosphofructo-1-kinase mRNA isoforms during neonatal maturation of heart, brain and muscle.

Authors:  Y Mhaskar; G Armour; G Dunaway
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  The ubiquitous cellular transcriptional factor USF targets the varicella-zoster virus open reading frame 10 promoter and determines virulence in human skin xenografts in SCIDhu mice in vivo.

Authors:  Xibing Che; Barbara Berarducci; Marvin Sommer; William T Ruyechan; Ann M Arvin
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Cell-type-dependent activity of the ubiquitous transcription factor USF in cellular proliferation and transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Y Qyang; X Luo; T Lu; P M Ismail; D Krylov; C Vinson; M Sawadogo
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Sequence determinants of DNA binding by the hematopoietic helix-loop-helix transcription factor TAL1: importance of sequences flanking the E-box core.

Authors:  K A Gould; E H Bresnick
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1998

7.  Identification of upstream stimulatory factor as transcriptional activator of the liver promoter of the glucokinase gene.

Authors:  P B Iynedjian
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  The initiator element of the adenovirus major late promoter has an important role in transcription initiation in vivo.

Authors:  H Lu; M D Reach; E Minaya; C S Young
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Myc versus USF: discrimination at the cad gene is determined by core promoter elements.

Authors:  K E Boyd; P J Farnham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Clustering of DNA sequences in human promoters.

Authors:  Peter C FitzGerald; Andrey Shlyakhtenko; Alain A Mir; Charles Vinson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.