Literature DB >> 8051154

-mu opiate receptor. Charged transmembrane domain amino acids are critical for agonist recognition and intrinsic activity.

C K Surratt1, P S Johnson, A Moriwaki, B K Seidleck, C J Blaschak, J B Wang, G R Uhl.   

Abstract

The mu opiate receptor is a principal brain site for activities of morphine, other opiate drugs, and opioid peptides in modulating pain and altering mood. Recent cloning of cDNAs encoding rat and human mu receptors reveals charged amino acid residues within putative transmembrane domains (TMs) II, III, and VI, a substantial N-terminal extracellular domain, and a C-terminal intracellular domain. Deletion of 64 N-terminal amino acids produced little effect on receptor function (Wang, J.B., Imai, Y., Eppler, C.M., Gregor, P., Spivak, C.E., and Uhl, G.R. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 10230-10234). Further deletion of 33 C-terminal amino acids yielded a receptor at which morphine, but not the substituted enkephalin DAMGO ([D-Ala2,MePhe4,Glyol5]enkephalin), inhibited adenylate cyclase. Alanine substitution for each charged TM residue in the N-terminally deleted receptor reduced affinities for morphine, DAMGO, and the opiate antagonist naloxone. Replacement of TM II Asp114 with asparagine or glutamic acid increased mu receptor affinity for naloxone. TM II and TM III glutamic acid substitutions for Asp114 and Asp147 reduced agonist binding affinities but allowed full inhibition of adenylate cyclase at high agonist concentrations. TM VI histidine substitution with alanine yielded a receptor that produced almost twice the cyclase inhibition displayed by the wild type receptor in parallel transient expression assays. These findings underscore the importance of charged residues in TM II, III, and VI for different receptor functions and the modest involvement of extensive portions of N- and C-terminal receptor domains in these processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8051154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  59 in total

Review 1.  Structural organization of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  A L Lomize; I D Pogozheva; H I Mosberg
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Molecular modeling study of the differential ligand-receptor interaction at the mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors.

Authors:  M Filizola; M Carteni-Farina; J J Perez
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Structural basis for μ-opioid receptor binding and activation.

Authors:  Adrian W R Serohijos; Shuangye Yin; Feng Ding; Josee Gauthier; Dustin G Gibson; William Maixner; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Luda Diatchenko
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Enoch S Huang
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Structure modeling of the chemokine receptor CCR5: implications for ligand binding and selectivity.

Authors:  M Germana Paterlini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Homology modeling of opioid receptor-ligand complexes using experimental constraints.

Authors:  Irina D Pogozheva; Magdalena J Przydzial; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Ultrastructural evidence for co-localization of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor and mu-opioid receptor in the rat nucleus locus coeruleus.

Authors:  Beverly A S Reyes; Julia D Glaser; Elisabeth J Van Bockstaele
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 8.  Molecular recognition of opioid receptor ligands.

Authors:  Brian E Kane; Bengt Svensson; David M Ferguson
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Mutation of a conserved serine in TM4 of opioid receptors confers full agonistic properties to classical antagonists.

Authors:  P A Claude; D R Wotta; X H Zhang; P L Prather; T M McGinn; L J Erickson; H H Loh; P Y Law
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Computational study of the heterodimerization between mu and delta receptors.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Ming Kai; Lian Jin; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.