Literature DB >> 8050657

Faculty promotion and publication rates in family medicine: 1981 versus 1989.

C Gjerde1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare academic promotion success in a cohort of full-time academic family medicine faculty nominated for promotion in university-based programs during the 1988-1989 academic year to 74 faculty nominees from a 1981 study.
METHODS: Responses were received from 97 of 122 chairs (80% response). Thirty-two schools reported on their 46 nominees.
RESULTS: In comparison to 1981, the likelihood of achieving academic promotion increased from 65% to 88% for all nominees, from 58% to 85% for candidates for associate professor, from 68% to 89% for physicians, and from 36% to 80% for faculty from public schools with low research support. All female nominees were promoted. Physicians nominated for assistant professor averaged 2.7 publications; for associate professor, 6.7; and for full professor, 13.8. For the 26 faculty nominated for associate professor: nominees from public institutions with high research and development funding had the most publications per year; nominees from programs in the Midwest and West wrote the most articles; and promoted nominees with PhD/EdD degrees wrote twice as many journal articles as MD/DO nominees.
CONCLUSIONS: The 46 nominees in 1989 represent a considerable decline from the 74 in 1981. The likelihood of achieving academic promotion increased significantly; successful nominees wrote 60% more articles than those denied promotion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8050657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  1 in total

1.  Research methods courses for GPs: ten years' experience in southern Sweden.

Authors:  A Håkansson; K Henriksson; A Isacsson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.