Literature DB >> 8050245

Surgical revision of malreduced acetabular fractures.

K A Mayo1, E Letournel, J M Matta, J W Mast, E E Johnson, C L Martimbeau.   

Abstract

Early failure of open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum presents a treatment challenge even more difficult than that of the primary injury. This study evaluates the success of reoperation for 64 patients with surgical malreduction or secondary loss of reduction. In 36 patients (56%) the reconstruction achieved was within 2 mm of being anatomic as judged by plain radiography. Overall, 27 patients (42%) had excellent or good outcomes at an average 4.2 year followup. Delay to reoperation appeared to have an adverse affect on the result of surgery. At followup 57% of patients reoperated on within 3 weeks of injury were rated good or excellent. This figure dropped to 29% when the delay exceeded 12 weeks. These data do not compare favorably with results obtained in large series of singly operated fractures; however, they do indicate that it is possible to salvage a significant number of failed open reductions by reoperation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8050245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

Review 1.  Management of neglected acetabular fractures.

Authors:  L A Veerappa; S K Tripathy; R K Sen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  [Surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures in the elderly. Osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis].

Authors:  C Fölsch; M M Alwani; V Jurow; R Stiletto
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Solutions for failed osteosynthesis of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Christopher Spering; Katharina Jäckle; Mehool R Acharya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  [The postoperative control CT after a fracture of the acetabulum. A useful quality control measure or an unnecessary exposure to radiation?].

Authors:  R Eberl; E J Müller; A Kaminski; G Muhr
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Complications after osteosynthetic treatment of acetabular fractures].

Authors:  P Schwabe; F Wichlas; C Druschel; C Jacobs; N P Haas; K-D Schaser; S Märdian
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  CT scan-guided percutaneous osteosynthesis of a complex, multifocal fracture of the pelvic girdle in a 14-year-old adolescent.

Authors:  Pierre-Thomas Gagné; Anne-Sophie Bertrand; Amandine Caudal; Tony El Hayek; Nicolas Amoretti
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Analysis of Predictors of Results after Surgical Treatment of Acetabular Fractures.

Authors:  Jong Ki Shin; Sung Jin An; Tae Sik Go; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  ANALYSIS OF THE SEGMENTAL IMPACTION OF FEMORAL HEAD FOLLOWING AN ACETABULAR FRACTURE SURGICALLY MANAGED.

Authors:  Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Camila Cohen Kaleka; Carina Cohen; Daniel Daniachi; Nelson Keiske Ono; Emerson Kiyoshi Honda; Giancarlo Cavalli Polesello; Walter Riccioli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08

9.  PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON SEVENTY-SIX CASES OF FRACTURED ACETABULUM WITH SURGICAL TREATMENT.

Authors:  André Gaudêncio Ignácio de Almeida; Carlos Antônio Garrido; Leonardo Eustáquio Vaz Amaral; Luiz Fernando Lindenberg Vargas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-06

10.  Posterior wall acetabulum fracture-dislocation with subsequent ipsilateral pipkin IV fracture-dislocation: How many hits can a hip take?

Authors:  Jonathan R Helms; Peter J Nowotarski
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.